The Paṭiccasamuppāda: A developed formula: D. M. WILLIAMS

Religious Studies 14 (1):35-56 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this article should become plain during the reading of it, but perhaps some prior explanation is needed. Almost from the beginning of my study of the paṭiccasamuppāda I have had the notion that it could not have come into existence in the form the usual twelvefold formulation takes. For reasons which I try to make clear this twelvefold formulation is not a satisfactory statement of what it is supposed to explain, namely the reasons for each individual's continued rebirths. I feel - and sadly I have to emphasize, before someone else does it for me, that in the final analysis I am relying more or less on intuition for my attitude towards the twelvefold formulation - that if one person alone had been responsible for the usually referred to formulation, and especially if that one person had been the Buddha, then those anomalies that now prevail would never have existed

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Paṭiccasamuppāda: A Developed Formula.D. M. Williams - 1978 - Religious Studies 14 (1):35 - 56.
On Truth-A Reply To C J F Williams.O. R. Jones - 1970 - Analysis 31 (October):24-29.
Routley’s formulation of transparency.B. H. Slater - 1992 - History and Philosophy of Logic 13 (2):215-224.
Moore's many paradoxes.Mitchell S. Green - 1999 - Philosophical Papers 28 (2):97-109.
The Musical Style of Hank Williams.Yun-Cheng Fu - 2004 - Dissertation, The University of Memphis

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
37 (#409,683)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references