David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In this chapter I discuss connections between machine learning and the philosophy of science. First I consider the relationship between the two disciplines. There is a clear analogy between hypothesis choice in science and model selection in machine learning. While this analogy has been invoked to argue that the two disciplines are essentially doing the same thing and should merge, I maintain that the disciplines are distinct but related and that there is a dynamic interaction operating between the two: a series of mutually beneficial interactions that changes over time. I will introduce some particularly fruitful interactions, in particular the consequences of automated scientific discovery for the debate on inductivism versus falsificationism in the philosophy of science, and the importance of philosophical work on Bayesian epistemology and causality for contemporary machine learning. I will close by suggesting the locus of a possible future interaction: evidence integration.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Andreas Matthias (2004). The Responsibility Gap: Ascribing Responsibility for the Actions of Learning Automata. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 6 (3):175-183.
Kevin B. Korb (2004). Introduction: Machine Learning as Philosophy of Science. Minds and Machines 14 (4):433-440.
S. Russell (1991). Inductive Learning by Machines. Philosophical Studies 64 (October):37-64.
Martin Možina, Jure Žabkar, Trevor Bench-Capon & Ivan Bratko (2005). Argument Based Machine Learning Applied to Law. Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (1):53-73.
Abraham Meidan & Boris Levin (2002). Choosing From Competing Theories in Computerised Learning. Minds and Machines 12 (1):119-129.
Jon Williamson (2004). A Dynamic Interaction Between Machine Learning and the Philosophy of Science. Minds and Machines 14 (4):539-549.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #92,624 of 1,696,167 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #92,132 of 1,696,167 )
How can I increase my downloads?