David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (1):223-240 (2009)
Despite his elusiveness on important issues, there is much in Michael Oakeshott's educational vision that Richard Peters quite rightly wishes to endorse. The main aim of this essay is, however, to consider Peters' justifiable critique of three features of Oakeshott's work. These are (1) the rigidity of his distinction between vocational and university education, (2) the lack of clarity and accuracy in his philosophy of teaching and learning, especially the under-conceptualisation of the role of example in teaching, (3) the over-emphasis on tradition in moral and civic learning
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Hanan A. Alexander (2008). Engaging Tradition : Michael Oakeshott on Liberal Learning. In Stephen Gough & Andrew Stables (eds.), Sustainability and Security Within Liberal Societies: Learning to Live with the Future. Routledge.
Dorothy Emmett & Michael Oakeshott (1963). Rationalism in Politics, and Other Essays. Philosophical Quarterly 13 (52):283.
Stephen M. Engel (2007). Political Education in/as the Practice of Freedom: A Paradoxical Defence From the Perspective of Michael Oakeshott. Journal of Philosophy of Education 41 (3):325–349.
Paul Heywood Hirst (1970). The Logic of Education. London,Routledge & K. Paul.
H. S. N. McFarland & R. S. Peters (1968). The Concept of Education. Philosophical Quarterly 18 (71):188.
Citations of this work BETA
Elizabeth Corey (2012). The Aesthetic and Moral Character of Oakeshott's Educational Writings. Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (4):86-98.
Kenneth B. Mcintyre (2012). Liberal Education and the Teleological Question; or Why Should a Dentist Read Chaucer? Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (4):341-363.
Similar books and articles
Michael A. Peters (2005). James D. Marshall: Philosopher of Education Interview with Michael A. Peters. Educational Philosophy and Theory 37 (3):291–297.
Eliyahu Rosenow (2004). Nietzsche's Educational Legacy Revised. A Review of Michael Peters and P. Smeyers (Eds.), 2001, Nietzsche's Legacy for Education: Past and Present Values. [REVIEW] Studies in Philosophy and Education 23 (2/3):189-202.
Corey Abel (2005). Appropriating Aristotle. In Corey Abel Timothy Fuller (ed.), The Intellectual Legacy of Michael Oakeshott.
Kelvin Stewart Beckett (2011). R.S. Peters and the Concept of Education. Educational Theory 61 (3):239-255.
Mark T. Mitchell (2001). Michael Polanyi and Michael Oakeshott. Tradition and Discovery 28 (2):23-34.
Kevin Williams (1989). The Dilemma of Michael Oakeshott: Oakeshott's Treatment of Equality of Opportunity in Education and His Political Philosophy. Journal of Philosophy of Education 23 (2):223–240.
Michael S. Katz (2009). R. S. Peters' Normative Conception of Education and Educational Aims. Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (1):97-108.
Michael Oakeshott (1989). The Voice of Liberal Learning: Michael Oakeshott on Education. Yale University Press.
Leslie Marsh (2005). Constructivism and Relativism in Oakeshott. In Corey Abel & Timothy Fuller (eds.), In The Intellectual Legacy of Michael Oakeshott. Imprint Academic.
Added to index2009-09-10
Total downloads19 ( #92,799 of 1,099,957 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #40,772 of 1,099,957 )
How can I increase my downloads?