Metaphilosophy 37 (2):277–283 (2006)
|Abstract||This article is a response to Ole Martin Skilleås's "Knowledge and Imagination in Fiction and Biography." The first section of the article summarizes the line of the argument in four theses: (1) What is real is more influential than what is made up; (2) there is no metaphysical chasm between autobiographers and us; (3) (auto)biographies are not just empirical; and (4) the moral lesson of a fiction need not be accepted. In the second section each of these theses is criticized. This criticism leads to the conclusion that we should welcome (auto)biographical texts in our moral investigations, but not at the cost of fictional texts. This conclusion is coupled with a proposal to formulate criteria to distinguish texts that matter from those that do not.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Stacie Friend (2011). Fictive Utterance and Imagining II. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 85 (1):163-180.
Ioannis Votsis, The Scope of Fiction: Comments on Tim Button's 'Where Fiction Ends and Reality Begins' 'Where Fiction Ends and Reality Begins'.
Bijoy H. Boruah (1988). Fiction and Emotion: A Study in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford University Press.
Stavroula Glezakos (forthcoming). Truth and Reference in Fiction. In Gillian Russell & Delia Graff Fara (eds.), Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Routledge.
Ole Martin Skilleas (2006). Knowledge and Imagination in Fiction and Autobiography. Metaphilosophy 37 (2):259-276.
Christopher Mole (2009). Fiction's Ontological Commitments. Philosophical Forum 40 (4):473-488.
Morwenna Griffiths & Gale Macleod (2008). Personal Narratives and Policy: Never the Twain? Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (s1):121-143.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #201,730 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?