What can history do for bioethics?

Bioethics 27 (4):215-223 (2013)
Abstract
This article details the relationship between history and bioethics. I argue that historians' reluctance to engage with bioethics rests on a misreading of the field as solely reducible to applied ethics, and overlooks previous enthusiasm for historical perspectives. I claim that seeing bioethics as its practitioners see it – as an interdisciplinary meeting ground – should encourage historians to collaborate in greater numbers. I conclude by outlining how bioethics might benefit from new histories of the field, and how historians can lend a fresh perspective to bioethical debates
Keywords history  pluralism  empirical turn  bioethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,404
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Robert Baker (2002). Bioethics and History. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (4):447 – 474.
Harold Braswell (2011). In Search of a Wide-Angle Lens. Hastings Center Report 41 (3):19-21.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-12-14

Total downloads

16 ( #104,305 of 1,102,989 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #36,733 of 1,102,989 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.