David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (3):595 - 637 (2010)
Hume's Dictum (HD) says, roughly and typically, that there are no metaphysically necessary connections between distinct, intrinsically typed, entities. HD plays an influential role in metaphysical debate, both in constructing theories and in assessing them. One should ask of such an influential thesis: why believe it? Proponents do not accept Hume's arguments for his dictum, nor do they provide their own; however, some have suggested either that HD is analytic or that it is synthetic a priori (that is: motivated by intuitions we have no good reason to question). Here I explore whether belief in HD is directly justified on either grounds. I motivate and present more formal characterizations of HD; I show that there are good prima facie cases to be made for HD's being analytic and for its being synthetic a priori; I argue that each of the prima facie cases fails, some things considered. I close by offering two suggestions for how belief in HD might be indirectly justified on argumentative grounds.
|Keywords||Hume Hume's Dictum necessary connections Laws of nature|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
D. M. Armstrong (1989). A Combinatorial Theory of Possibility. Cambridge University Press.
D. M. Armstrong (1993). A World of States of Affairs. Philosophical Perspectives 7:429-440.
D. M. Armstrong (1991). Classes Are States of Affairs. Mind 100 (2):189-200.
D. M. Armstrong (1983). What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge University Press.
George Bealer (2002). Modal Epistemology and the Rationalist Renaissance. In Tamar S. Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford University Press. 71--125.
Citations of this work BETA
Matteo Morganti (2011). Substrata and Properties: From Bare Particulars to Supersubstantivalism? Metaphysica 12 (2):183-195.
Darren Bradley (2013). Functionalism and The Independence Problems. Noûs 47 (1):n/a-n/a.
Ben Bramble (2013). The Distinctive Feeling Theory of Pleasure. Philosophical Studies 162 (2):201-217.
Jonathan Tallant (2010). Not a Total Failure. Philosophia 38 (4):795-810.
Anthony Shiver (2013). Mereological Bundle Theory and the Identity of Indiscernibles. Synthese:1-13.
Similar books and articles
Louis deRosset (2009). Production and Necessity. Philosophical Review 118 (2):153-181.
Ken Levy (2000). Hume, the New Hume, and Causal Connections. Hume Studies 26 (1):41-75.
Aisling Crean (2010). Humean Humility. Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy (Special Issue edited by Helen Beebee and Markus Schrenk) 13.
Chris Slupik (1995). A New Interpretation of Hume's 'Of Miracles'. Religious Studies 31 (4):517 - 536.
Kevin Meeker (2007). Hume on Knowledge, Certainty and Probability: Anticipating the Disintegration of the Analytic/Synthetic Divide? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (2):226–242.
Jessica M. Wilson (2010). From Constitutional Necessities to Causal Necessities. In Helen Beebee & Nigel Sabbarton-Leary (eds.), The Semantics and Metaphysics of Natural Kinds. Routledge.
Jessica M. Wilson (forthcoming). Hume's Dictum and Natural Modality: Counterfactuals. In Alastair Wilson (ed.), Asymmetries of Time and Chance.
Daniel Stoljar (2007). Distinctions in Distinction. In Jesper Kallestrup & Jakob Hohwy (eds.), Being Reduced: New Essays on Causation and Explanation in the Special Sciences. Oxford University Press.
Jeffrey Ketland (2002). Hume = Small Hume. Analysis 62 (1):92–93.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads233 ( #1,391 of 1,088,378 )
Recent downloads (6 months)16 ( #6,950 of 1,088,378 )
How can I increase my downloads?