David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Erkenntnis 44 (3):327 - 339 (1996)
On the epistemic view of vagueness, a vague expression has sharp boundaries whose location speakers of the language cannot recognize. The paper argues that one of the deepest sources of resistance to the epistemic view is the idea that all truths are cognitively accessible from truths in a language for natural science, conceived as precise, in a sense explained. The implications of the epistemic view for issues about the relations between vague predicates and scientific predicates are investigated.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Timothy Williamson (2000). Margins for Error: A Reply. Philosophical Quarterly 50 (198):76-81.
Timothy Williamson (2002). Epistemicist Models: Comments on Gómez-Torrente and Graff. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (1):143-150.
Giovanni Boniolo (2007). Death and Transplantation: Let's Try to Get Things Methodologically Straight. Bioethics 21 (1):32–40.
Similar books and articles
Diana Raffman (2009). Demoting Higher-Order Vagueness. In Sebastiano Moruzzi & Richard Dietz (eds.), Cuts and Clouds. Vaguenesss, its Nature and its Logic. Oxford University Press. 509--22.
Rohit Parikh (1996). Vague Predicates and Language Games. Theoria 11 (3):97-107.
Jesse Prinz (1998). Vagueness, Language, and Ontology. Electronic Journal of Analytic Philosophy 6.
Rosanna Keefe (2010). Teaching & Learning Guide For: Vagueness: Supervaluationism. Philosophy Compass 5 (2):213-215.
Robert Stainton (2010). On 'the Denial of Bivalence is Absurd'. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):369-382.
Dominic Hyde, Sorites Paradox. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Greg Ray (2004). Williamson's Master Argument on Vagueness. Synthese 138 (2):175 - 206.
Rosanna Keefe (2000). Theories of Vagueness. Cambridge University Press.
Timothy Williamson (1994). Vagueness. Routledge.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads41 ( #49,594 of 1,679,439 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #78,545 of 1,679,439 )
How can I increase my downloads?