Berkeley, and Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays
Journal of the History of Philosophy 22 (3):372-375 (1984)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,882 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKenneth P. Winkler (1989). Berkeley: An Interpretation. Clarendon Press.
Walter R. Ott (2004). The Cartesian Context of Berkeley's Attack on Abstraction. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (4):407–424.
Gabriel Moked (1988). Particles And Ideas: Bishop Berkeley's Corpuscularian Philosophy. Clarendon Press.
Kenneth P. Winkler (1992). Berkeley. Idealistic Studies 22 (3):300-301.
Kenneth Winkler (ed.) (2005). The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. Cambridge University Press.
Daniele Bertini (2007). Berkeley and Gentile: A Reading of Berkeley's Master Argument. Idealistic Studies 37 (1):43-50.
David Berman (2005). Berkeley and Irish Philosophy. Thoemmes Continuum.
Walter Ott (2006). Descartes and Berkeley on Mind: The Fourth Distinction. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (3):437 – 450.
Kenneth P. Winkler (2005). Berkeley and the Doctrine of Signs. In Kenneth Winkler (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads20 ( #62,418 of 556,909 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,909 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
