Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9 (1):17-35 (2011)
|Abstract||In his essay ‘‘Of the Standard of Taste,’’ Hume argues that artworks with morally flawed outlooks (including Homer's poems) are, to some extent, aesthetically flawed. While Hume's remarks regarding the relationship between art and morality have influenced contemporary aestheticians, Hume's own position has struck many people as incoherent. For Hume appears to entangle himself in two separate contradictions. First, Hume seems to claim both that true judges should not enter into vicious sentiments and that true judges should adopt the standpoint of an artwork's intended audience. But The Iliad, say, was obviously intended for an audience that shared Homer's flawed moral outlook. Second, Hume appears to claim that our moral sentiments are both highly resistant to change and extremely fragile. This essay defends Hume against these two objections by drawing increased attention to the role that Hume's aesthetics assigns to the faculty of good sense or sound reason|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michelle Mason (2001). Moral Prejudice and Aesthetic Deformity: Rereading Hume's "of the Standard of Taste". Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 59 (1):59-71.
Theodore Gracyk (2011). Delicacy in Hume's Theory of Taste. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9 (1):1-16.
Christopher Williams (2011). Aesthetics and Morals in the Philosophy of David Hume. Hume Studies 36 (1):109-113.
Christopher Perricone (2011). What Women Want: (Among Other Things) Quality Art. Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (3):88-102.
Alessandra Stradella (2013). The Fiction of the Standard of Taste: David Hume on the Social Constitution of Beauty. Journal of Aesthetic Education 46 (4):32-47.
Brian Ribeiro (2007). Hume's Standard of Taste and the de Gustibus Sceptic. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (1):16-28.
Nancy Schauber (2009). Complexities of Character. Hume Studies 35 (1/2):29-55.
James Shelley (2004). Hume's Principles of Taste: A Reply to Dickie. British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):84-89.
Noriaki Iwasa (2011). Sentimentalism and the Is-Ought Problem. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11 (33):323-352.
Alix Cohen (2005). In Defence of Hume's Historical Method. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (3):489 – 502.
Noriaki Iwasa (2011). Hume's Alleged Success Over Hutcheson. Synthesis Philosophica 26 (2):323-336.
Jacqueline Taylor (2011). Gilding and Staining and the Significance of Our Moral Sentiments. Hume Studies 36 (1):89-95.
Jacqueline Taylor (2002). Hume on the Standard of Virtue. Journal of Ethics 6 (1):43-62.
James Baillie (2000). Hume on Morality. Routledge.
Jan Staněk (2009). Hume and the Question of Good Manners. Estetika 46 (1).
Added to index2011-03-04
Total downloads53 ( #19,364 of 549,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,333 of 549,087 )
How can I increase my downloads?