David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Res Publica 18 (2):173-188 (2012)
In this article, I examine A. John Simmons’s philosophical anarchism, and specifically, the problems that result from the combination of its three foundational principles: the strong correlativity of legitimacy rights and political obligations; the strict distinction between justified existence and legitimate authority; and the doctrine of personal consent, more precisely, its supporting assumptions about the natural freedom of individuals and the non-natural states into which individuals are born. As I argue, these assumptions, when combined with the strong correlativity and strict distinction theses, undermine Simmons’s claim, which is central to his philosophical anarchism, that a state may be justified in enforcing the law, even if illegitimate or unjustified in existing
|Keywords||A. John Simmons Philosophical anarchism Political obligation Rights and obligations Justification and legitimacy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Horton (2007). In Defence of Associative Political Obligations: Part Two. Political Studies 55 (1):1-19.
Dudley Knowles (2010). Political Obligation. Routledge.
A. John Simmons (1979). Moral Principles and Political Obligations. Princeton University Press.
A. John Simmons (1987). The Anarchist Position: A Reply to Klosko and Senor. Philosophy and Public Affairs 16 (3):269-279.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kevin Walton (2013). The Particularities of Legitimacy: John Simmons on Political Obligation. Ratio Juris 26 (1):1-15.
Jon Garthoff (2010). Legitimacy is Not Authority. Law and Philosophy 29 (6):669-694.
Christopher Heath Wellman (2005). Is There a Duty to Obey the Law? Cambridge University Press.
Robert Louis Hoffman (ed.) (1970/2010). Anarchism as Political Philosophy. Aldinetransaction.
Chaim Gans (1992). Philosophical Anarchism and Political Disobedience. Cambridge University Press.
John T. Sanders (1996). The State of Statelessness. In John T. Sanders & Jan Narveson (eds.), For and Against the State: New Philosophical Readings. Rowman and Littlefield.
A. John Simmons (1999). Justification and Legitimacy. Ethics 109 (4):739-771.
Christopher W. Morris (2005). Natural Rights and Political Legitimacy. Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (1):314-329.
Fabienne Peter, Political Legitimacy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A. W. (2003). A Review of A. John Simmons, Justification and Legitimacy: Essays on Rights and Obligations. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 22 (2):195-216.
Paul McLaughlin (2002). Mikhail Bakunin: The Philosophical Basis of His Theory of Anarchism. Algora Pub..
Gary Chartier (2013). Anarchy and Legal Order: Law and Politics for a Stateless Society. Cambridge University Press.
Charles Sayward (1982). Anarchism and Rights Violations. Critica 14 (40):105-116.
Added to index2011-11-17
Total downloads21 ( #86,416 of 1,101,879 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #68,243 of 1,101,879 )
How can I increase my downloads?