Graduate studies at Western
Zygon 46 (1):224-245 (2011)
|Abstract||Abstract. The Western conception of the individual as a rational, self-directing agent is a mythology that organizes and distorts religion, science, economics, and politics. It produces an abstracted and atomized form of engagement that is fatal to collective self-governance. And it turns democracy into the enemy of equality. Considering the meaning of democracy and autonomy from a perspective that takes the subject as truly social would refocus our attention on the constitutive contexts and practices necessary for the production of citizens who are capable of meaningful self-governance. Under modern conditions, it is in the development of sexual autonomy that we learn how to take initiative with respect to our well-being and do so in concert with others. Where the view of rational agency as the defining characteristic of humanity yields a deracinated view of autonomy, a more realistic, humanistic view that we are, necessarily, social beings yields a view of freedom and self-governance as social phenomena that require empathy, negotiation, compromise, cooperation, and mutual recognition and respect|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Zhen Han (2006). Democracy as a Way to Social Compromise. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (1):1-5.
Eva Erman (forthcoming). In Search for Democratic Agency in Deliberative Governance&Quot;. European Journal of International Relations.
Jean Harvey (unknown). The Burden of Securing Social Justice: Institutions, Individuals, and Moral Action. :137-152.
Christian List & John Dryzek (2003). Social Choice Theory and Deliberative Democracy: A Reconciliation. British Journal of Political Science 33 (1):1-28.
Matteo Bianchin (2003). Reciprocity, Individuals and Community: Remarks on Phenomenology, Social Theory and Politics. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (6):631-654.
Pierre Steiner & John Stewart (2009). From Autonomy to Heteronomy (and Back): The Enaction of Social Life. [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (4):527-550.
J. Jeremy Wisnewski (2000). Foucault and Public Autonomy. Continental Philosophy Review 33 (4):417-439.
Fabienne Peter (2007). Democratic Legitimacy and Proceduralist Social Epistemology. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (3):329-353.
Jean Harvey (2006). The Burden of Securing Social Justice. Social Philosophy Today 22:137-152.
Hanne De Jaegher & Tom Froese (2009). On the Role of Social Interaction in Individual Agency. Adaptive Behavior 17 (5):444-460.
S. Akhtar (2011). Liberal Recognition for Identity? Only for Particularized Ones. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (1):66-87.
Jeff Noonan (2005). Modernization, Rights, and Democratic Society: The Limits of Habermas's Democratic Theory. [REVIEW] Res Publica 11 (2):101-123.
Andrea Westlund (2009). Rethinking Relational Autonomy. Hypatia 24 (4):26 - 49.
B. Saunders (2012). Defining the Demos. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (3):280-301.
Waheed Hussain (2006). Democratic Capitalism and Respect for the Value of Freedom. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 2 (s 3-4):280-293.
Added to index2011-02-24
Total downloads14 ( #90,570 of 739,347 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,347 )
How can I increase my downloads?