Reimagining democratic theory for social individuals
Zygon 46 (1):224-245 (2011)
| Abstract | Abstract. The Western conception of the individual as a rational, self-directing agent is a mythology that organizes and distorts religion, science, economics, and politics. It produces an abstracted and atomized form of engagement that is fatal to collective self-governance. And it turns democracy into the enemy of equality. Considering the meaning of democracy and autonomy from a perspective that takes the subject as truly social would refocus our attention on the constitutive contexts and practices necessary for the production of citizens who are capable of meaningful self-governance. Under modern conditions, it is in the development of sexual autonomy that we learn how to take initiative with respect to our well-being and do so in concert with others. Where the view of rational agency as the defining characteristic of humanity yields a deracinated view of autonomy, a more realistic, humanistic view that we are, necessarily, social beings yields a view of freedom and self-governance as social phenomena that require empathy, negotiation, compromise, cooperation, and mutual recognition and respect | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesZhen Han (2006). Democracy as a Way to Social Compromise. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (1):1-5.
Eva Erman (forthcoming). In Search for Democratic Agency in Deliberative Governance". European Journal of International Relations.
Matteo Bianchin (2003). Reciprocity, Individuals and Community: Remarks on Phenomenology, Social Theory and Politics. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (6):631-654.
Pierre Steiner & John Stewart (2009). From Autonomy to Heteronomy (and Back): The Enaction of Social Life. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (4).
J. Jeremy Wisnewski (2000). Foucault and Public Autonomy. Continental Philosophy Review 33 (4):417-439.
Fabienne Peter (2007). Democratic Legitimacy and Proceduralist Social Epistemology. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (3):329-353.
Jean Harvey (2006). The Burden of Securing Social Justice. Social Philosophy Today 22:137-152.
Hanne De Jaegher & Tom Froese (2009). On the Role of Social Interaction in Individual Agency. Adaptive Behavior 17 (5):444-460.
S. Akhtar (2011). Liberal Recognition for Identity? Only for Particularized Ones. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (1):66-87.
Jeff Noonan (2005). Modernization, Rights, and Democratic Society: The Limits of Habermas's Democratic Theory. Res Publica 11 (2).
B. Saunders (2012). Defining the Demos. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (3):280-301.
Waheed Hussain (2006). Democratic Capitalism and Respect for the Value of Freedom. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 2 (s 3-4):280-293.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-02-24Total downloads13 ( #87,887 of 549,068 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
