Thomas Aquinas, Siger of Brabant, and Their Use of Avicenna in Clarifying the Subject of Metaphysics
Graduate studies at Western
The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:15-26 (1999)
|Abstract||Both Aquinas and Siger were familiar with a fundamental disagreement within the earlier philosophical tradition concerning the subject of metaphysics: Is it being as being, or is it divine being? If Avicenna represented one approach to this issue, and Averroes another, both Thomas and Siger were closer to Avicennathan to Averroes in their respective solutions. Nonetheless, each resolved the issue in a distinct way. Also contested in the earlier tradition was the question of whether it belongs to physics or to metaphysics to demonstrate the existence of God. Again, Avicenna represents one side on this issue, and Averroes the other. Thomas’s personal position continues to be debated by contemporary scholars, and Siger’s seems to fall between those proposed by Avicenna and Averroes.Finally, Aquinas is credited with having developed a new and unique way of accounting for the discovery of being as being, through a process known as separatio; though there are antecedents for this in Avicenna|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
R. E. Houser (2011). Aristotle and Two Medieval Aristotelians on the Nature of God. International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (203):355 - 375.
Bernardo C. Bazàn (1981). Intellectum Speculativum : Averroes, Thomas Aquinas, and Siger of Brabant on the Intelligible Object. Journal of the History of Philosophy 19 (4):425-446.
John Wippel (2005). Thomas Aquinas and Siger of Brabant on Being and the Science of Being as Being. The Modern Schoolman 82 (2):143-168.
Peter Furlong (2009). The Latin Avicenna and Aquinas on the Relationship Between God and the Subject of Metaphysics. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:129-140.
Andrew LaZella (2011). Siger of Brabant on Divine Providence and the Indeterminacy of Chance. International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (4):483-500.
Thomas P. Bukowski (1987). Siger of Brabant Vs. Thomas Aquinas on Theology. The New Scholasticism 61 (1):25-32.
Antoine Cote (2008). Siger of Brabant and Thomas Aquinas on Divine Power and the Separability of Accidents. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (4):681 – 700.
Rahim Acar (2005). Talking About God and Talking About Creation: Avicenna's and Thomas Aquinas' Positions. Brill.
Leo Sweeney (1968). On the Eternity of the World. By Thomas Aquinas, Siger of Brabant, St. Bonaventure. Trans. Cyril Vollert, S.J., Lottie H. Kendzierski, Paul M. Byrne. [REVIEW] The Modern Schoolman 45 (2):177-177.
Edward P. Mahoney (1974). Saint Thomas and Siger of Brabant Revisited. The Review of Metaphysics 27 (3):531 - 553.
Roland J. Teske (2007). Some Aspects of Henry of Ghent's Debt to Avicenna's Metaphysics. Modern Schoolman 85 (1):51 - 70.
Jon McGinnis (2011). The Ultimate Why Question: Avicenna on Why God Is Absolutely Necessary. In The Ultimate Why Question: Why is There Anything at All Rather Than Nothing Whatsoever? Cath Univ Amer Pr.
Jari Kaukua (2011). The Physics of the Healing , Books I-Iv (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (2):245-246.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads7 ( #142,740 of 749,720 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #62,995 of 749,720 )
How can I increase my downloads?