David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Zygon 46 (3):639-654 (2011)
Abstract. In Science and Spirituality, Michael Ruse attempts to reconcile traditional Christianity and modern science by arguing that Christianity addresses questions that lie beyond the domain of science. I argue that Ruse's solution raises a number of problems that render it unsatisfactory for both the scientist and believer. First, despite his objections to “God of the gaps” arguments, his own strategy for identifying those questions that are beyond the limits of science seems to raise the problem in a new form. Second, what Ruse offers as evidence for the limits of science is better construed as evidence for deep disagreements among scientists and as such does not support his claims about the limits of science. Third, in aiming to establish their independence, Ruse subordinates religion to science. Finally, his support of traditional theology as a mode of religious understanding might cause concern for those who believe that certain kinds of theological reflection are at odds with scientific thinking
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Gordon Graham & D. Z. Phillips (1978). Religion Without Explanation. Philosophical Quarterly 28 (112):280.
Michael Ruse (2008). Evolution and Religion: A Dialogue. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Citations of this work BETA
Iris Fry (2012). Is Science Metaphysically Neutral? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 43 (3):665-673.
Similar books and articles
Michael Ruse (2011). Making Room for Faith in an Age of Science: A Response to David Wisdo. Zygon 46 (3):655-672.
Edward Schoen (2011). Michael Ruse, Science and Spirituality: Making Room for Faith in the Age of Science. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (1):97-101.
Carlos Mariscal (2011). Epistemology, Necessity, and Evolution: A Critical Review of Michael Ruse's Philosophy After Darwin. Biology and Philosophy 26 (3):449-457.
Logan Paul Gage (2012). Michael Ruse: Science and Spirituality: Making Room for Faith in the Age of Science. [REVIEW] Religious Studies Review 38 (1):10.
James F. Moore (2010). Science and Spirituality: Making Room for Faith in the Age of Science. By Michael Ruse. Zygon 45 (4):1023-1024.
Andrew Pinsent (2012). Science and Spirituality: Making Room for Faith in the Age of Science. By Michael Ruse. (Cambridge UP, 2010. Pp 264. Price £20.99.). [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 62 (247):438-441.
Michael Ruse (2011). Science and Religion Today. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (2):167-177.
William Dembski, Intelligent Design's Contribution to the Debate Over Evolution: A Reply to Henry Morris.
Alvin Plantinga (1997). Methodological Naturalism, Part 2. Origins and Design 18 (2):22-34.
Michael Ruse (1982). Creation Science Is Not Science. Science, Technology, and Human Values 7 (40):72-8.
Michael Ruse (2010). Atheism, Naturalism and Science: Three in One? In Peter Hrrison (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Science and Religion. Cambridge University Press.
Peter Woolcock (1993). Ruse's Darwinian Meta-Ethics: A Critique. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 8 (4):423-439.
Added to index2011-08-13
Total downloads40 ( #48,828 of 1,413,259 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #94,880 of 1,413,259 )
How can I increase my downloads?