David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Review 109 (3):459-462 (2000)
Conceptual analysis is currently out of favour, especially in North America. This is partly through misunderstanding of its nature. Properly understood, conceptual analysis is not a mysterious activity discredited by Quine that seeks after the a priori in some hard‐to‐understand sense. It is, rather, something familiar to everyone, philosophers and non‐philosophers alike—or so I argue. Another reason for its unpopularity is a failure to appreciate the need for conceptual analysis. The cost of repudiating it has not been sufficiently appreciated; without it, we cannot address a whole raft of important questions
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Brie Gertler (1999). Frank Jackson, From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis:From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Ethics 110 (1):202-205.
Tadeusz Szubka (1999). Jackson, Frank. From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Review of Metaphysics 53 (2):455-457.
H. Lillehammer (1999). Review. From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (1):169-173.
Simon Blackburn (2000). Critical Notice of Frank Jackson, From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (1):119 – 124.
Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis (2003). Concepts and Conceptual Analysis. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (2):253-282.
David Plunkett (2011). Expressivism, Representation, and the Nature of Conceptual Analysis. Philosophical Studies 156 (1):15-31.
Alexander S. Harper (2012). An Oblique Epistemic Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Metaphilosophy 43 (3):235-256.
Andres Gleeson (1999). Deducing the Mind. Inquiry 42 (3-4):385-410.
Katalin Balog (2001). Commentary on Frank Jackson's From Metaphysics to Ethics. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (3):645–652.
Tim Button (2013). Truth by Analysis: Games, Names, and Philosophy By Colin McGinn. [REVIEW] Analysis 73 (3):577-580.
Frank Jackson (1998). From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Oxford University Press.
Per Sandin (2006). Has Psychology Debunked Conceptual Analysis? Metaphilosophy 37 (1):26–33.
D. Gene Witmer (2001). Conceptual Analysis, Circularity, and the Commitments of Physicalism. Acta Analytica 16 (26):119-133.
Added to index2010-09-12
Total downloads26 ( #104,520 of 1,699,591 )
Recent downloads (6 months)14 ( #47,237 of 1,699,591 )
How can I increase my downloads?