David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environmental Ethics 12 (3):275-282 (1990)
I contrast metaphysical implications from physics and ecology and compare them through two concepts, the field, primary in physics and borrowed by ecology, and wholeness, postulated in ecology and borrowed by physics. I argue that several implications from physics are unacceptably reductive or erroneous and identify an old and a new ecology. Metaphysical implications from the old ecology are quite different from the new ecology, as weIl as from quantum or Newtonian physics
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Massimo Pigliucci (2002). Are Ecology and Evolutionary Biology “Soft” Sciences? Annales Zoologici Finnici 39:87-98.
Charles Weiss (1931). The Metaphysical Implications of Modern Physics. [New York, Printed by the Bristol Press, Inc..
Frank B. Golley (1987). Deep Ecology From the Perspective of Environmental Science. Environmental Ethics 9 (1):45-55.
Colette Sciberras (2002). Deep Ecology and Ecofeminism: The Self in Environmental Philosophy. Dissertation, Lancaster
Karen J. Warren & Jim Cheney (1993). Ecosystem Ecology and Metaphysical Ecology: A Case Study. Environmental Ethics 15 (2):99-116.
J. Baird Callicott (1986). The Metaphysical Implications of Ecology. Environmental Ethics 8 (4):301-316.
Alan Wittbecker (1990). Metaphysical Implications From Physics and Ecology. Environmental Ethics 12 (3):275-282.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #258,237 of 1,088,907 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?