David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5 (1):69-83 (2009)
The aim of this paper is to resist four arguments, originally developed by Mark Siebel, that seem to support scepticism about reflexive communicative intentions. I argue, first, that despite their complexity reflexive intentions are thinkable mental representations. To justify this claim, I offer an account of the cognitive mechanism that is capable of producing an intention whose content refers to the intention itself. Second, I claim that reflexive intentions can be individuated in terms of their contents. Third, I argue that the explanatory power of the theory of illocutionary reflexive intentions is not as limited as it would initially seem. Finally, I reject the suggestion that the conception of reflexive communicative intentions ascribes to a language user more cognitive abilities than he or she really has.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Elisabeth Pacherie (2000). The Content of Intentions. Mind and Language 15 (4):400-432.
Raimo Tuomela (2005). We-Intentions Revisited. Philosophical Studies 125 (3):327 - 369.
Élisabeth Pacherie (2003). La dynamique des intentions. Dialogue 42 (03):447-.
Richard Scheer (2004). The ‘Mental State’ Theory of Intentions. Philosophy 79 (1):121-131.
Luca Ferrero (2009). Conditional Intentions. Noûs 43 (4):700 - 741.
Alfred R. Mele (2008). Proximal Intentions, Intention-Reports, and Vetoing. Philosophical Psychology 21 (1):1 – 14.
Gergely Csibra (2010). Recognizing Communicative Intentions in Infancy. Mind and Language 25 (2):141-168.
Norris F. Krueger Jr & Jill Kickul, So You Thought the Intentions Model Was Simple? Cognitive Style and the Specification of Entrepreneurial Intentions Models.
Raimo Tuomela (2000). Collective and Joint Intention. Mind and Society 1 (2):39-69.
Rex Welshon (2002). Intentions, Goals, and the Archaeological Record. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):425-426.
Elisabeth Pacherie & Patrick Haggard (2010). What Are Intentions? In L. Nadel & W. Sinnott-Armstrong (eds.), Conscious Will and Responsibility. A tribute to Benjamin Libet. Oxford University Press. 70--84.
Matthew Stone, Communicative Intentions and Conversational Processes in Human-Human and Human-Computer Dialogue.
Steffen Borge (2009). Intentions and Compositionality. SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):100-106.
Cristina Corredor (2009). The Reflexivity of Explicit Performatives. Theoria 24 (3):283-299.
Jing Zhu & Andrei A. Buckareff (2006). Intentions Are Mental States. Philosophical Explorations 9 (2):235 – 242.
Added to index2011-06-17
Total downloads11 ( #138,606 of 1,102,804 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #296,987 of 1,102,804 )
How can I increase my downloads?