OUP USA (2011)
|Abstract||The Metaphysics of Gender is a book about gender essentialism: what it is and why it might be true. It opens with the question: What is gender essentialism? After distinguishing between essentialism about gender viewed as a kind and essentialism about gender in relation to individuals and their lived experiences, successive chapters introduce the ingredients for a theory of gender essentialism about individuals, called uniessentialism. Gender uniessentialism claims that a social individual's gender is uniessential to that individual. It is modeled on Aristotle's essentialism in which the form or essence of an individual is the principle of unity of that individual. For example, the form or essence of an artifact, like a house, is what unifies the material parts of the house into a new individual (over and above a sum of parts). Since an individual's gender is a social role (or set of social norms) the kind of unity in question is not the unity of material parts, as it is in the artifact example. Instead, the central claim of gender uniessentialism is that an individual's gender provides that individual with a principle of normative unity -- a principle that orders and organizes all of that individual's other social roles. An important ingredient in gender uniessentialism concerns exactly which individuals are at issue -- human organisms, persons or social individuals? Given the view of gender as a social role the claim of gender essentialism can only be coherently expressed of social individuals. The Metaphysics of Gender argues that a social individual's gender is uniessential to it.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$19.45 used (81% off) $76.49 new (23% off) $86.66 direct from Amazon (13% off) Amazon page|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Charlotte Witt (forthcoming). What Is Gender Essentialism? Feminist Metaphysics:11--25.
Hang-Yue Ngo, Sharon Foley, Angela Wong & Raymond Loi (2003). Who Gets More of the Pie? Predictors of Perceived Gender Inequity at Work. Journal of Business Ethics 45 (3):227 - 241.
T. V. Barchunova (2003). The Selfish Gender, or the Reproduction of Gender Asymmetry in Gender Studies. Studies in East European Thought 55 (1):3-25.
J. Butler (2004). Undoing Gender. Routledge.
Jason St John Oliver Campbell & Chioke I.’Anson (2007). Beyond Gender Essentialism and the Social and Construction of Gender. International Studies in Philosophy 39 (1):19-30.
Sean Valentine & Gary Fleischman (2003). The Impact of Self-Esteem, Machiavellianism, and Social Capital on Attorneys' Traditional Gender Outlook. Journal of Business Ethics 43 (4):323 - 335.
Mari Mikkola (2011). Ontological Commitments, Sex and Gender. In Charlotte Witt (ed.), Feminist Metaphysics. Springer.
Julie A. Nelson (1992). Thinking About Gender. Hypatia 7 (3):138 - 154.
Theodore Bach (2012). Gender Is a Natural Kind with a Historical Essence. Ethics 122 (2):231-272.
Robin May Schott (1996). Gender and "Postmodern War". Hypatia 11 (4):19 - 29.
Alice Pechriggl & Gertrudetr Postl (2005). Body and Gender Within the Stratifications of the Social Imaginary. Hypatia 20 (2):102-118.
Emily A. Bishop, A Child's Expertise: Establishing Statutory Protection for Intersexed Children Who Reject Their Gender of Assignment.
John A. Robertson (2001). Preconception Gender Selection. American Journal of Bioethics 1 (1):2 – 9.
Added to index2012-04-15
Total downloads10 ( #114,329 of 722,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?