Graduate studies at Western
In Steven Hales (ed.), What Philosophy Can Tell You About Your Cat. Open Court Publishing (2008)
|Abstract||Some philosophers (such as Kant and Rawls) think it is only wrong to be cruel to cats because it will make one behave cruelly to humans. This explanation is unsatisfactory. Why? Because being cruel to your cat is a direct wrong to your cat regardless of the effects it has on other humans. Ascribing the wrongness of cruelty to the fact it will make one callous to other humans is to assess the character of the cruel person not the act they are performing. Cruelty to your cat is wrong because it wrongs your cat directly.|
|Keywords||Cruel Animals Kant Rawls|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Daniel A. Dombrowski (1998). Rawls and Animals. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):63-77.
Tom Regan (1980). Animal Rights, Human Wrongs. Environmental Ethics 2 (2):99-120.
Albert Bandura (2006). A Murky Portrait of Human Cruelty. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (3):225-226.
Traci Warkentin (2010). Interspecies Etiquette: An Ethics of Paying Attention to Animals. Ethics and the Environment 15 (1):pp. 101-121.
G. Randolph Mayes (2009). Naturalizing Cruelty. Biology and Philosophy 24 (1):21–34.
Lara Denis (2000). Kant's Conception of Duties Regarding Animals: Reconstruction and Reconsideration. History of Philosophy Quarterly 17 (4):405-23.
Added to index2009-11-08
Total downloads41 ( #32,786 of 740,551 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,551 )
How can I increase my downloads?