Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):349-373 (2006)
|Abstract||In the article the problem of independence in mathematics is discussed. The status of the continuum hypothesis, large cardinal axioms and the axiom of constructablility is presented in some detail. The problem whether incompleteness is really relevant for ordinary mathematics and for empirical science is investigated. Another aim of the article is to give some arguments for the thesis that the problem of reliability and justification of new axioms is well-posed and worthy of attention. In my opinion, investigations concerning the status of independent sentences give insight into our understanding of mathematical concepts, of mathematical knowledge and of the role of mathematics in empirical science.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Edwin Coleman (2009). The Surveyability of Long Proofs. Foundations of Science 14 (1-2):27-43.
Leon Horsten, Philosophy of Mathematics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Stojan Obradović & Slobodan Ninković (2009). The Heuristic Function of Mathematics in Physics and Astronomy. Foundations of Science 14 (4).
Stewart Shapiro (1983). Mathematics and Reality. Philosophy of Science 50 (4):523-548.
Frank Waaldijk (2005). On the Foundations of Constructive Mathematics – Especially in Relation to the Theory of Continuous Functions. Foundations of Science 10 (3).
Thomas Tymoczko (1991). Mathematics, Science and Ontology. Synthese 88 (2):201 - 228.
Alan Baker (2003). The Indispensability Argument and Multiple Foundations for Mathematics. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):49–67.
Kenny Easwaran (2008). The Role of Axioms in Mathematics. Erkenntnis 68 (3):381 - 391.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #178,675 of 549,088 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?