Utilitas 12 (01):79- (2000)
|Abstract||Apart from a short introduction, this contribution consists of a translation of Tadeusz Kotarbinski’s “Utilitarianism and The Ethics of Pity” (1914). In that very concise and relatively unknown early note, written before he embarked on his long and influential career as a nominalist logician and philosopher of science, Kotarbinski had formulated four astonishingly ‘modern’ objections to utilitarianism. Unlike Christian ‘ethics of pity’, utilitarian ethics (i) disregards the normative importance of the distinction between preventing suffering and promoting happiness, (ii) leaves no room for supererogation, (iii) leaves no room for agent-relativity in morality insofar as it disallows ‘inefficient’ self-sacrifice, and (iv) rejects the possibility of genuine ethical dilemmas. To what extent was Kotarbinski a pioneer in his critique? This question is posed but not answered.|
|Keywords||utilitarianism Christian ethics supererogation utilitarianism moral dilemmas|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Douglas W. Portmore (forthcoming). Supererogation. In J. E. Crimmins & D. C. Long (eds.), Encyclopedia of Utilitarianism.
Jean-Paul Vessel (2010). Supererogation for Utilitarianism. American Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):299 - 319.
J. Moreh (1992). Economic Analysis, Common-Sense Morality and Utilitarianism. Erkenntnis 37 (1):115 - 143.
Michael A. Slote (2010). Selected Essays. Oxford University Press.
Henry R. West (2004). An Introduction to Mill's Utilitarian Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Gerald Lang (2013). Should Utilitarianism Be Scalar? Utilitas 25 (1):80-95.
Alison Hills (2010). Utilitarianism, Contractualism and Demandingness. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239):225-242.
Robert E. Goodin (1995). Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Baruch A. Brody (1970). Moral Rules and Particular Circumstances. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,Prentice-Hall.
David Phillips (2011). Sidgwickian Ethics. Oxford University Press.
T. L. S. Sprigge (1965). A Utilitarian Reply to Dr. McCloskey. Inquiry 8 (1-4):264 – 291.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads15 ( #85,924 of 722,776 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,776 )
How can I increase my downloads?