Matrix representations for structural strengthenings of a propositional logic
Studia Logica 38 (3):263 - 266 (1979)
| Abstract | The aim of this paper is to show that the operations of forming direct products and submatrices suffice to construct exhaustive semantics for all structural strengthenings of the consequence determined by a given class of logical matrices. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKazimierz Swirydowicz (1999). There Exist Exactly Two Maximal Strictly Relevant Extensions of the Relevant Logic R. Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (3):1125-1154.
Piotr Wojtylak (1978). On Structural Completeness of Many-Valued Logics. Studia Logica 37 (2):139 - 147.
Stephen L. Bloom (1975). Some Theorems on Structural Consequence Operations. Studia Logica 34 (1):1 - 9.
Jan Zygmunt (1974). A Note on Direct Products and Ultraproducts of Logical Matrices. Studia Logica 33 (4):349 - 357.
Grzegorz Malinowski (2009). Beyond Three Inferential Values. Studia Logica 92 (2):203 - 213.
Brunetto Piochi (1983). Logical Matrices and Non-Structural Consequence Operators. Studia Logica 42 (1):33 - 42.
Janusz Czelakowski (1980). Reduced Products of Logical Matrices. Studia Logica 39 (1):19 - 43.
Wiesław Dziobiak (1981). The Lattice of Strengthenings of a Strongly Finite Consequence Operation. Studia Logica 40 (2):177 - 193.
Wiesław Dziobiak (1983). Cardinalities of Proper Ideals in Some Lattices of Strengthenings of the Intuitionistic Propositional Logic. Studia Logica 42 (2-3):173 - 177.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads4 ( #178,473 of 548,999 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
