David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Bioethics 26 (9):455-463 (2012)
Health-related Quality of Life measures have recently been attacked from two directions, both of which criticize the preference-based method of evaluating health states they typically incorporate. One attack, based on work by Daniel Kahneman and others, argues that ‘experience’ is a better basis for evaluation. The other, inspired by Amartya Sen, argues that ‘capability’ should be the guiding concept. In addition, opinion differs as to whether health evaluation measures are best derived from consultations with the general public, with patients, or with health professionals. And there is disagreement about whether these opinions should be solicited individually and aggregated, or derived instead from a process of collective deliberation. These distinctions yield a wide variety of possible approaches, with potentially differing policy implications. We consider some areas of disagreement between some of these approaches. We show that many of the perspectives seem to capture something important, such that it may be a mistake to reject any of them. Instead we suggest that some of the existing ‘instruments’ designed to measure HR QoLs may in fact successfully already combine these attributes, and with further refinement such instruments may be able to provide a reasonable reconciliation between the perspectives
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Richard Ashcroft (2003). The Ethics and Governance of Medical Research: What Does Regulation Have to Do with Morality? New Review of Bioethics 1 (1):41-58.
Similar books and articles
Stephen John (2009). Why 'Health' is Not a Central Category for Public Health Policy. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (2):129-143.
Stephen Holland (2009). Public Health Paternalism—a Response to Nys. Public Health Ethics 2 (3):285-293.
John McKie, Rosalind Hurworth, Bradley Shrimpton, Jeff Richardson & Catherine Bell (2013). Priority Setting and Patient Adaptation to Disability and Illness: Outcomes of a Qualitative Study. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis (3):1-17.
Jonny Anomaly (2011). Public Health and Public Goods. Public Health Ethics 4 (3):251-259.
Matt Commers (2002). Determinants of Health: Theory, Understanding, Portrayal, Policy. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ross Upshur (2013). What Does Public Health Ethics Tell (Or Not Tell) Us About Intervening in Non-Communicable Diseases? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (1):19-28.
Marc Lappé (1983). Values and Public Health: Value Considerations in Setting Health Policy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 4 (1).
D. M. Hausman (2012). Measuring or Valuing Population Health: Some Conceptual Problems. Public Health Ethics 5 (3):229-239.
J. -F. Menard (2010). A 'Nudge' for Public Health Ethics: Libertarian Paternalism as a Framework for Ethical Analysis of Public Health Interventions? Public Health Ethics 3 (3):229-238.
Virginia L. Wiseman (1999). Culture, Self-Rated Health and Resource Allocation Decision-Making. Health Care Analysis 7 (3):207-223.
D. S. Goldberg (2012). Social Justice, Health Inequalities and Methodological Individualism in US Health Promotion. Public Health Ethics 5 (2):104-115.
John Owens & Alan Cribb (2012). Conflict in Medical Co-Production: Can a Stratified Conception of Health Help? [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 20 (3):268-280.
David A. Gruenewald (2012). Can Health Care Rationing Ever Be Rational? Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 40 (1):17-25.
O. F. Norheim (2010). Gini Impact Analysis: Measuring Pure Health Inequity Before and After Interventions. Public Health Ethics 3 (3):282-292.
S. Andrew Schroeder (2013). Rethinking Health: Healthy or Healthier Than? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (1):131-159.
Added to index2011-04-30
Total downloads27 ( #125,141 of 1,777,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #291,290 of 1,777,935 )
How can I increase my downloads?