David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):908-909 (2001)
We note two important problems in the Theory of Event Coding. First, because the representational format of features and events is unspecified, the theory is difficult to test. Second, the theory lacks a mechanism for the integration of features into an event code when the features are shared by different events. Possible ways of solving these problems are suggested.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Martin Lipscomb (2010). Events and Event Identity: Under-Explored Topics in Nursing. Nursing Philosophy 11 (2):88-99.
Tim Fernando (2007). Observing Events and Situations in Time. Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (5):527-550.
Noel Hendrickson (2006). Towards a More Plausible Exemplification Theory of Events. Philosophical Studies 129 (2):349 - 375.
Marjorie Spear Price (2008). Particularism and the Spatial Location of Events. Philosophia 36 (1):129-140.
Elias E. Savellos (2000). When Are Events Parts? Philosophical Papers 29 (3):223-247.
Susan Schneider, Events. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Jeffrey M. Zacks (2001). Scaling Up From Atomic to Complex Events. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):909-910.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #333,850 of 1,410,144 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,743 of 1,410,144 )
How can I increase my downloads?