David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Utilitas 10 (1):1-16 (1998)
In this paper I want to do two things. One concerns Mill’s attitude to public indecency. In On Liberty Mill expresses the conventional view that certain actions, if conducted in public, are an affront to good manners, and can properly be prohibited. I want to come to an understanding of Mill’s position so that it allows him to defend this part of conventional morality, but does not disrupt certain of his liberal convictions: principally the conviction that what consenting adults do in private is no-one ‘s concern but their own. The difficulty is to find an argument that Mill could have used to defend the position that some things which, though acceptable in private, can rightly be stopped if attempted in public. The other thing I want to do is consider the impact of Mill’s view of indecency on the interpretation of the Liberty Principle. There remain difficulties here which, to my knowledge, have not been adequately explored. So I want to look at a range of interpretative alternatives. In the first part of the paper I shall raise and explore the issue of the interpretative problems. In the second part I shall look at some ways of trying to justify Mill’s view of indecency on characteristically Millian grounds. And in the final part I shall explore the somewhat surprising consequences of the discussion of the second part for the interpretative questions raised in the first
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Alexander Brown (2008). The Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006: A Millian Response. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (1):1-24.
Similar books and articles
Alan E. Fuchs (2001). Autonomy, Slavery, and Mill's Critique of Paternalism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (3):231-251.
Bruce Jennings (2009). Public Health and Liberty: Beyond the Millian Paradigm. Public Health Ethics 2 (2):123-134.
Pergiorgio Donatelli (2006). Mill's Perfectionism. Prolegomena 5 (2):149-164.
D. G. Brown (2012). Mill's Justice and Political Liberalism. In Leonard Kahn (ed.), Mill on Justice. Palgrave Macmillan. 135.
Chin-Liew Ten (2002). Was Mill a Liberal? Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (3):355-370.
Ted Honderich (1967). Mill on Liberty. Inquiry 10 (1-4):292 – 297.
Madison Powers, Ruth Faden & Yashar Saghai (2012). Liberty, Mill and the Framework of Public Health Ethics. Public Health Ethics 5 (1):6-15.
Added to index2009-04-15
Total downloads116 ( #9,633 of 1,102,136 )
Recent downloads (6 months)19 ( #11,339 of 1,102,136 )
How can I increase my downloads?