David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Journal of Bioethics 8 (2):28 – 38 (2008)
New scientific advances have created previously unheard of possibilities for enhancing combatants' performance. Future war fighters may be smarter, stronger, and braver than ever before. If these technologies are safe, is there any reason to reject their use? In this article, I argue that the use of enhancements is constrained by the importance of maintaining the moral responsibility of military personnel. This is crucial for two reasons: the military's ethical commitments require military personnel to be morally responsible agents, and moral responsibility is necessary for integrity and the moral emotions of guilt and remorse, both of which are important for moral growth and psychological well-being. Enhancements that undermined combatants' moral responsibility would therefore undermine the military's moral standing and would harm combatants' well-being. A genuine commitment to maintaining the military's ethical standards and the well-being of combatants therefore requires a careful analysis of performance-enhancing technologies before they are implemented.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Bernard Arthur Owen Williams (1981). Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers, 1973-1980. Cambridge University Press.
R. Jay Wallace (1996). Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. Harvard University Press.
John Jamieson Carswell Smart & Bernard Williams (1973). Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge University Press.
Allen E. Buchanan, Dan W. Brock, Norman Daniels & Daniel Wikler (2000). From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice. Cambridge University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Andrew Fenton & Timothy Krahn (2008). Who's to Regret, What's to Regret? American Journal of Bioethics 8 (2):42 – 43.
Patrick Lin (2010). Ethical Blowback From Emerging Technologies. Journal of Military Ethics 9 (4):313-331.
Richard H. Dees (2008). Soldiers as Agents. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (2):46 – 47.
Richard Edmund Ashcroft (2008). Regulating Biomedical Enhancements in the Military. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (2):47 – 49.
Ori Lev (2008). Assessing the Importance of Maintaining Soldiers' Moral Responsibility—Possible Trade-Offs. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (2):44 – 45.
Similar books and articles
Thomas C. Wyatt & Reuven Gal (eds.) (1990). Legitimacy and Commitment in the Military. Greenwood Press.
Roger Wertheimer (2010). The Moral Singularity of Military Professionalism. In Empowering Our Military Conscience.
Helene Ingierd & Henrik Syse (2005). Responsibility and Culpability in War. Journal of Military Ethics 4 (2):85-99.
Ineke Malsch (2013). The Just War Theory and the Ethical Governance of Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):461-486.
Jessica Wolfendale (2007). Torture and the Military Profession. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sidney Axinn (2009). A Moral Military. Temple University Press.
Frederic Gilbert (2011). Working While Under the Influence of Performance-Enhancing Drugs: Is One “More Responsible”? American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (3):57-59.
John McMurtry (1991). Rethinking the Military Paradigm. Inquiry 34 (4):415-432.
Jessica Wolfendale (2008). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Performance-Enhancing Technologies and Moral Responsibility in the Military”. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (2):W4 – W6.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads47 ( #90,014 of 1,907,681 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #158,844 of 1,907,681 )
How can I increase my downloads?