Religious Studies 37 (3):293-306 (2001)
|Abstract||Before beginning my response, let me express the honour I feel in having these three friends and distinguished philosophical colleagues comment so thoughtfully on my ideas in Divine Discourse. I warmly thank them for their ‘labours’. I propose mirroring the general structure of the book itself in my response. First, I'll consider what Helm says about my delineation of the topic, second, what Quinn says about my discussion of God speaking; third, what Westphal says about my discussion of interpreting for God's speech; and last, what Quinn says about my discussion of the epistemology of believing that God speaks.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Merold Westphal (2001). On Reading God the Author. Religious Studies 37 (3):271-291.
Philip L. Quinn (1993). Social Evil: A Response to Adams. Philosophical Studies 69 (2-3):187 - 194.
Paul Helm (2001). Speaking and Revealing. Religious Studies 37 (3):249-258.
Philip L. Quinn (1978). Divine Commands and Moral Requirements. Clarendon Press.
James Kraft (2006). Philip Quinn's Contribution to the Epistemic Challenge of Religious Diversity. Religious Studies 42 (4):453-465.
Merold Westphal (2009). The Joy of Being Indebted : A Concluding Response. In B. Keith Putt (ed.), Gazing Through a Prism Darkly: Reflections on Merold Westphal's Hermeneutical Epistemology. Fordham University Press.
Robert McKim (2012). Cooking with Philip Quinn. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 71 (3):239-245.
Philip L. Quinn (2001). Can God Speak? Does God Speak? Religious Studies 37 (3):259-269.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #67,643 of 549,694 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,694 )
How can I increase my downloads?