Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy of Science 46 (2):287-294 (1979)
|Abstract||We examine critically the interdependence between science and philosophy which Sklar asserts in Space, Time, and Spacetime. We find that such a view makes it difficult to criticize the ideas of science, like that of absolute space, on their own merits, without importing extraneous philosophical associations. It also impedes appreciation of the importance, and subtlety, of explanation in scientific theory. As a result, particular explanations, such as the one Newton offered of his bucket experiment, are dismissed facilely-- indeed, all geometric explanation appears illegitimate--, and such general attitudes as conventionalism appear to lack rationale|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Lawrence Sklar (1973). Statistical Explanation and Ergodic Theory. Philosophy of Science 40 (2):194-212.
Herbert Feigl & Grover Maxwell (eds.) (1962). Scientific Explanation, Space, and Time: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. University of Minnesota Press.
Lawrence Sklar (2000). Theory and Truth: Philosophical Critique Within Foundational Science. Oxford University Press.
Oliver Pooley (2004). Comments on Sklar's ``Barbour's Relationist Metric of Time''. Chronos 6:77-86.
Richard Swinburne (1968). Space and Time. New York, St. Martin's P..
Robert Weingard (1977). Book Review:Space, Time and Spacetime Lawrence Sklar. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 44 (1):167-.
Robert Rynasiewicz, Newton's Views on Space, Time, and Motion. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Bradford Skow (2007). Sklar's Maneuver. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (4):777 - 786.
Lawrence Sklar (1974). Space, Time and Spacetime. University of California Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #114,762 of 754,747 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,372 of 754,747 )
How can I increase my downloads?