Graduate studies at Western
Cognitive Science 35 (8):1456-1488 (2011)
|Abstract||Metaphor has a double life. It can be described as a directional process in which a stable, familiar base domain provides inferential structure to a less clearly specified target. But metaphor is also described as a process of finding commonalities, an inherently symmetric process. In this second view, both concepts may be altered by the metaphorical comparison. Whereas most theories of metaphor capture one of these aspects, we offer a model based on structure-mapping that captures both sides of metaphor processing. This predicts (a) an initial processing stage of symmetric alignment; and (b) a later directional phase in which inferences are projected to the target. To test these claims, we collected comprehensibility judgments for forward (e.g., “A rumor is a virus”) and reversed (“A virus is a rumor”) metaphors at early and late stages of processing, using a deadline procedure. We found an advantage for the forward direction late in processing, but no directional preference early in processing. Implications for metaphor theory are discussed|
|Keywords||Career of metaphor Embodied metaphor Metaphor Analogy Structural alignment|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Xiaoxi Huang, Huaxin Huang, Beishui Liao & Cihua Xu (2013). An Ontology-Based Approach to Metaphor Cognitive Computation. Minds and Machines 23 (1):105-121.
Samuel D. Guttenplan (2005). Objects of Metaphor. Oxford University Press.
Sam Glucksberg & Catrinel Haught (2006). On the Relation Between Metaphor and Simile: When Comparison Fails. Mind and Language 21 (3):360–378.
Robyn Carston (2010). Metaphor: Ad Hoc Concepts, Literal Meaning and Mental Images. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110 (3pt3):295-321.
Roger M. White (1996). The Structure of Metaphor: The Way the Language of Metaphor Works. Blackwell.
Raymond W. Gibbs Jr & Markus Tendahl (2006). Cognitive Effort and Effects in Metaphor Comprehension: Relevance Theory and Psycholinguistics. Mind and Language 21 (3):379–403.
Akira Utsumi (2011). Computational Exploration of Metaphor Comprehension Processes Using a Semantic Space Model. Cognitive Science 35 (2):251-296.
Patti D. Nogales (1999). Metaphorically Speaking. Csli Publications.
Lynne Tirrell (1989). Extending: The Structure of Metaphor. Noûs 23 (1):17-34.
Kim Chong Chong (2006). Zhuangzi and the Nature of Metaphor. Philosophy East and West 56 (3):370-391.
Marina Rakova (2003). The Extent of the Literal: Metaphor, Polysemy and the Theories of Concepts. Palgrave Macmillan.
Michael Glanzberg (2007). Metaphor and Lexical Semantics. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 3.
Celeste M. Condit (2001). Blueprints and Recipes: Gendered Metaphors for Genetic Medicine. Journal of Medical Humanities 22 (1):29-39.
Mark A. Matienzo, On the Very Importance of the Metaphoric as Semantic to Communication, Understanding, and the Philosophy of Language.
George Lakoff (1980/2003). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
Added to index2011-09-20
Total downloads14 ( #90,611 of 739,403 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,403 )
How can I increase my downloads?