Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||The eminent French biologist and historian of biology, François Jacob, once notoriously declared “On n’interroge plus la vie dans les laboratoires”: laboratory research no longer inquires into the notion of ‘Life’. Nowadays, as David Hull puts it, “both scientists and philosophers take ontological reduction for granted… Organisms are ‘nothing but’ atoms, and that is that.” In the mid-twentieth century, from the immediate post-war period to the late 1960s, French philosophers of science such as Georges Canguilhem, Raymond Ruyer and Gilbert Simondon returned to Jacob’s statement with an odd kind of pathos: they were determined to reverse course. Not by imposing a different kind of research program in laboratories, but by an unusual combination of historical and philosophical inquiry into the foundations of the life sciences (particularly medicine, physiology and the cluster of activities that were termed ‘biology’ in the early 1800s). Even in as straightforwardly scholarly a work as La formation du concept de réflexe aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles (1955), Canguilhem speaks oddly of “defending vitalist biology,” and declares that Life cannot be grasped by logic (or at least, “la vie déconcerte la logique”). Was all this historical and philosophical work merely a reassertion of ‘mysterian’, magical vitalism? In order to answer this question we need to achieve some perspective on Canguilhem’s ‘vitalism’, notably with respect to its philosophical influences such as Kurt Goldstein.|
|Keywords||Canguilhem vitalism French philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Alain Badiou (2013). Badiou and the Philosophers: Interrogating 1960s French Philosophy. Bloomsbury Academic.
John Protevi (2008). The "Miniscule Hiatus": Neo-Vitalism in the Great French Philosophy of the 1960s: The Implications of Immanence: Toward a New Concept of Life. Research in Phenomenology 38 (1):129-133.
Jean Gayon (1998). The Concept of Individuality in Canguilhem's Philosophy of Biology. Journal of the History of Biology 31 (3):305 - 325.
Sebastian Normandin & Charles T. Wolfe (forthcoming). Vitalism and the Scientific Image: An Introduction. In Sebastian Normandin & Charles T. Wolfe (eds.), Vitalism and the scientific image, 1800-2010. Springer.
Charles T. Wolfe (2010). Do Organisms Have an Ontological Status? History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 32 (2-3):195-232.
John S. Ransom (1997). Forget Vitalism: Foucault and Lebensphilosophie. Philosophy and Social Criticism 23 (1):33-47.
C. Chimisso (2003). The Tribunal of Philosophy and its Norms: History and Philosophy in Georges Canguilhem's Historical Epistemology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 34 (2):297-327.
Sebastian Rand (2011). Organism, Normativity, Plasticity: Canguilhem, Kant, Malabou. Continental Philosophy Review 44 (4):341-357.
Eva-Maria Engelen (2007). Georges Canguilhem – Philosoph Und Wissenschaftshistoriker der Lebenswissenschaften. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 55 (3):480-481.
G. Canguilhem (1985). Bibliographie Des travaux de Georges Canguilhem. Revue de Métaphysique Et de Morale 90 (1):99 - 105.
Mariam Fraser, Sarah Kember & Celia Lury (eds.) (2006). Inventive Life: Approaches to the New Vitalism. Sage.
Pierre-Olivier Méthot (2009). French Epistemology Overseas: Analyzing the Influence of Georges Canguilhem in Québec. Humana-Mente. Journal of Philosophical Studies 9:39-58.
Added to index2011-07-27
Total downloads117 ( #5,714 of 722,940 )
Recent downloads (6 months)27 ( #4,617 of 722,940 )
How can I increase my downloads?