David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (3):315-356 (2003)
Thomas Williams has developed a radical interpretation of Duns Scotus’s voluntarism using an earlier interpretation of my own as a foil. He argues that the goodness of creatures and the rightness of actions are wholly dependent on the divine will, apart from any reference to the divine intellect, human nature, or any principle other than God’s own arbitrary will. I explain how his interpretation fails to account for the roles that essential goodness and divine justice play in divine volition. The unmitigated voluntarism that Williams develops does not conform to the full range of authentic Scotistic texts. Despite the interest Williams’s voluntarism may have if taken as a theoretical position, it does not do justice to the nuance and speculative depth of Scotus’s actual understanding of the divine will, whose creative artistry is repugnant to arbitrary volition. I am grateful to Williams for the provocation to develop further the richness of Scotus’s volutarism
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Thomas Williams (1998). The Unmitigated Scotus. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 80 (2):162-181.
Marilyn McCord Adams (1987). Duns Scotus on the Goodness of God. Faith and Philosophy 4 (4):486-505.
Lukáš Novák (2012). Divine Ideas, Instants of Nature, and the Spectre of “Verum Esse Secundum Quid ” A Criticism of M. Renemann's Interpretation of Scotus. Studia Neoaristotelica 9 (2):185-203.
Richard Cross (2010). Recent Work on the Philosophy of Duns Scotus. Philosophy Compass 5 (8):667-675.
Thomas Williams (1997). Reason, Morality, and Voluntarism in Duns Scotus. Modern Schoolman 74 (2):73-94.
Giorgio Pini (2012). Scotus on Hell. Modern Schoolman 89 (3-4):223-241.
Tobias Hoffmann (2009). Duns Scotus on the Origin of the Possibles in the Divine Intellect. In Stephen F. Brown, Thomas Dewender & Theo Kobusch (eds.), Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century. Brill.
Richard Cross (2012). Duns Scotus and Analogy. Modern Schoolman 89 (3-4):147-154.
Thomas Williams (ed.) (2003). The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus. Cambridge University Press.
Stephen D. Dumont (1992). Transcendental Being: Scotus and Scotists. Topoi 11 (2):135-148.
Michael D. Robinson (2009). Truth in Metaphysics. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (4):467-490.
Thomas Williams (1998). William A. Frank and Allan B. Wolter, Duns Scotus, Metaphysician. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 43 (2):125-127.
Richard Cross (1999). Duns Scotus. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2011-02-22
Total downloads9 ( #165,488 of 1,101,803 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #306,516 of 1,101,803 )
How can I increase my downloads?