David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Arguments are movements of thought. From a logical point of view, such a movement is justifiable as it tends to preserve or transmit truth. To speak of such tendency is to abstract from particular movements of thought and to ascent to the forms of such movements. Thus logical theory is said to concern rules of validity or cogency that one may use to evaluate forms of arguments, forms as may be instantiated by particular sets of statements which we may use to represent particular movements of thought.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Griselda Gutiérrez Castañeda & Ivan Marquez (1994). Feminist Movements and Their Constitution as Political Subjects. Hypatia 9 (1):184 - 192.
Stephen Barker (2011). Truth-Bearers and the Unsaid. In Ken Turner (ed.), Making Semantics Pragmatic. CUP.
F. Abiola Irele & Biodun Jeyifo (eds.) (2010). The Oxford Encyclopedia of African Thought: 2-Volume Set. OUP USA.
Erkki Huovinen & Tobias Pontara (2011). Methodology in Aesthetics: The Case of Musical Expressivity. Philosophical Studies 155 (1):45 - 64.
Dov Guido Boella, Leendert der Torre M. Gabbavany & Serena Villata (forthcoming). Meta-Argumentation Modelling I: Methodology and Techniques. Studia Logica.
Kent Bach (2005). Tthe Top 10 Minconceptions About Implicature. In , Festchrift for Larry Horn. John Benjamins.
Stephen Barker (2003). Truth and Conventional Implicature. Mind 112 (445):1-34.
Added to index2009-03-08
Total downloads19 ( #73,427 of 1,004,677 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?