David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (2006)
David B. Wong proposes that there can be a plurality of true moralities, moralities that exist across different traditions and cultures, all of which address facets of the same problem: how we are to live well together. Wong examines a wide array of positions and texts within the Western canon as well as in Chinese philosophy, and draws on philosophy, psychology, evolutionary theory, history, and literature, to make a case for the importance of pluralism in moral life, and to establish the virtues of acceptance and accommodation. Wong's point is that there is no single value or principle or ordering of values and principles that offers a uniquely true path for human living, but variations according to different contexts that carry within them a common core of human values. We should thus be modest about our own morality, learn from other approaches, and accommodate different practices in our pluralistic society.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$17.00 used (70% off) $25.95 new (11% off) $28.95 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BJ37.W66 2006|
|ISBN(s)||019538329X 0195305396 9780195305395 9780195383294|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Hagop Sarkissian, John Park, David Tien, Jennifer Wright & Joshua Knobe (2011). Folk Moral Relativism. Mind and Language 26 (4):482-505.
Daniel Lapsley & Patrick Hill (2008). On Dual Processing and Heuristic Approaches to Moral Cognition. Journal of Moral Education 37 (3):313-332.
Christian Coseru (2014). Buddhism, Comparative Neurophilosophy, and Human Flourishing. Zygon 49 (1):208-219.
Andrés Carlos Luco (forthcoming). Non-Negotiable: Why Moral Naturalism Cannot Do Away with Categorical Reasons. Philosophical Studies:1-18.
David Capps, Michael P. Lynch & Daniel Massey (2009). A Coherent Moral Relativism. Synthese 166 (2):413 - 430.
Similar books and articles
John Ladd (1973). Ethical Relativism. Belmont, Calif.,Wadsworth Pub. Co..
William L. Langenfus (1988). A Problem for Harman's Moral Relativism. Philosophy Research Archives 14:121-136.
P. Bloomfield (2009). Review: David Wong: Natural Moralities. [REVIEW] Mind 118 (469):225-230.
Alexus McLeod (2011). Natural Moralities – By David Wong. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 38 (3):491-495.
Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward (1990). Moral Relativism and Deontic Logic. Synthese 85 (1):139 - 152.
Seungbae Park (2011). Defence of Cultural Relativism. Cultura 8 (1):159-170.
David B. Wong (1995). Pluralistic Relativism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 20 (1):378-399.
Christopher W. Gowans (2007). Review of David B. Wong, Natural Moralities: A Defense of Pluralistic Relativism. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (4).
Ricardo Parellada (2007). Natural Moralities: A Defense of Pluralistic Relativism. Review of Metaphysics 61 (2):451-452.
Mohammad A. Shomali (2001). Ethical Relativism: An Analysis of the Foundations of Morality. Distributed by Saqi Books.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads104 ( #31,652 of 1,780,762 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #140,361 of 1,780,762 )
How can I increase my downloads?