The Possibility of Philosophical Understanding: Essays for Barry Stroud
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (2011)
I argue that the contextualist anti-skeptical strategy fails because it misconstrues skepticism by overlooking two important aspects of skepticism: first, all of our knowledge of the external world is brought into question at one fell swoop; second, skepticism depends on certain ideas about sense-perception and its role in our knowledge of the world. Contextualists may have solved ‘the skeptical paradox’ in their own terms, but such a solution cannot in any way make skepticism less threatening to human knowledge or to the philosophical understanding of human knowledge. I also discuss some important aspects of the practice of knowledge attribution in order to show that the more we can make sense of particular knowledge attributions, the less we can take skepticism seriously, and that the practice of knowledge attribution as we understand and engage in it presupposes that we have knowledge of the world.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John Greco (ed.) (2008). The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford University Press.
Barry Stroud (1984). Skepticism and the Possibility of Knowledge. Journal of Philosophy 81 (10):545-551.
Hilary Putnam (2001). Skepticism, Stroud and the Contextuality of Knowledge. Philosophical Explorations 4 (1):2 – 16.
J. Bridges, N. Kolodny & W. Wong (eds.) (forthcoming). The Possibility of Philosophical Understanding: Essays for Barry Stroud. Oxford University Press.
Jonathan Ellis (forthcoming). Stroud's Modest Transcendental Argument. In W. Wong, N. Kolodny & J. Bridges (eds.), The Possibility of Philosophical Understanding: Essays for Barry Stroud. Oxford University Press.
Barry Stroud (2000). Meaning, Understanding, and Practice: Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.
Wai-Hung Wong (2005). The Skeptical Paradox and the Indispensability of Knowledge-Beliefs. Synthese 143 (3):273-290.
Barry Stroud (1989). Understanding Human Knowledge in General. In Marjorie Clay & Keith Lehrer (eds.), Knowledge and Skepticism. Westview Press.
Barry Stroud (2000). Understanding Human Knowledge: Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.
Wai-Hung Wong (2011). What the Skeptic Still Can't Learn From How We Use the Word 'Know'. In J. Bridges, N. Kolodny & W. Wong (eds.), The Possibility of Philosophical Understanding: Reflections on the Thought of Barry Stroud. Oxford University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-06-22
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?