David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 10 (8):595 - 600 (1991)
Fraud and misconduct in scientific research appears to be increasing since 1980 when several cases were disclosed. Earlier instances were handled awkwardly, but the scientific community has since mobilized and issued guidelines about responding to allegations of misconduct and about the responsible conduct of research. Scientists, editors and the institutions of science are slowly learning how to cope with this problem.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Michael Gonin (2007). Business Research, Self-Fulfilling Prophecy, and the Inherent Responsibility of Scholars. Journal of Academic Ethics 5 (1):33-58.
Rohan Miller & Grant Michelson (2013). Fixing the Game? Legitimacy, Morality Policy and Research in Gambling. Journal of Business Ethics 116 (3):601-614.
Sybil Francis (1999). Developing a Federal Policy on Research Misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):261-272.
Nicholas H. Steneck (1999). Confronting Misconduct in Science in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has Not Been Accomplished? Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):161-176.
Stephen E. Loeb (1994). Ethics and Accounting Doctoral Education. Journal of Business Ethics 13 (10):817 - 828.
Similar books and articles
Katherine Alfredo & Hillary Hart (2011). The University and the Responsible Conduct of Research: Who is Responsible for What? [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):447-457.
Seth D. Baum, Michelle Stickler, James S. Shortle, Klaus Keller, Kenneth J. Davis, Donald A. Brown, Erich W. Schienke & Nancy Tuana (2011). The Role of the National Science Foundation Broader Impacts Criterion in Enhancing Research Ethics Pedagogy. Social Epistemology 23 (3):317-336.
Carl Mitcham (2003). Co-Responsibility for Research Integrity. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):273-290.
Arthur Bonito, Sandra Titus & David Wright (2012). Assessing the Preparedness of Research Integrity Officers (RIOs) to Appropriately Handle Possible Research Misconduct Cases. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):605-619.
Barbara Mishkin (1999). Scientific Misconduct: Present Problems and Future Trends. Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):283-292.
Michael C. Loui (2002). Seven Ways to Plagiarize: Handling Real Allegations of Research Misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4):529-539.
Jean-Philippe Breittmayer, Martine Bungener, Hugues De The, Evelyne Eschwege, Michel Fougereau, Gilles Guedj, Claude Kordon, Olivier Philippe, Maric-Catherine Postel-Vinay & Laurence Schaffar-Esterle (2000). Responding to Allegations of Scientific Misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):41-48.
James J. Dooley & Helen M. Kerch (2000). Evolving Research Misconduct Policies and Their Significance for Physical Scientists. Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):109-121.
Lawrence J. Rhoades (2002). Beyond Conflict of Interest: The Responsible Conduct of Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):459-468.
Eleanor G. Shore (1995). Effectiveness of Research Guidelines in Prevention of Scientific Misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):383-387.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #225,722 of 1,902,050 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #205,572 of 1,902,050 )
How can I increase my downloads?