John Woodhouse (ed.)
Clarendon Press (1997)
|Abstract||ante and Governance brings to the most grandiose of Dante's messages in the ivine Comedy critical viewpoints whose originality would, at any time, constitute an important addition to Dante scholarship, but the book is also notable for an approach which during the course of its composition spontaneously evolved as pragmatic and historical, particularly when seen against much contemporary Dante cricism. It explores Dante's breathtaking ambition to convince Europe's rulers and their subjects to create and embrace a universal peace, guaranteed by Pope and Holy Roman Emperor, which might afford serenity for mankind fully to develop its wonderful potentialities. In that context, a group of scholars, internationally known for their expertise not only in Dante studies but also in medieval literature and history, was invited to Oxford to discuss the poet's objectives. Each chose to argue a case from a close reading of Dante's own texts, using clear and jargon-free lamguage. Those deliberations created a well-focused and coherent group of papers on a variety of subjects, ranging from an aesthetic appreciation of Dante's depiction of free-will and moral responsibility, to a feminist perception of his attitude to the role of women in fourteenth-century Florentine public life.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Buy the book||$121.39 used (14% off) $126.35 new (10% off) $133.00 direct from Amazon (5% off) Amazon page|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Simon Ravenscroft (2011). Usury In The Inferno: Auditing Dante's Debt To The Scholastics. Comitatus 42:89-114.
Marina Glazova (1984). Mandel'štam and Dante: Thedivine Comedy in Mandel'štam's Poetry of the 1930s. Studies in East European Thought 28 (4):281-335.
William Franke (2012). Dante's Deconstruction and Reconstruction of Prophetic Voice and Vision in the Malebolge (Inferno XVIII–XXIII). Philosophy and Literature 36 (1):111-121.
Jason Aleksander (2010). The Aporetic Ground of Revelation’s Authority in the Divine Comedy and Dante’s Demarcation and Defense of Philosophical Authority. Essays in Medieval Studies 26:1-14.
Brenda Deen Schildgen (2012). Divine Providence: A History: Bible, Virgil, Orosius, Augustine, Dante. Continuum.
Daryl Koehn (2000). Traversing the Inferno. Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (1):255-268.
Christine O.’Connell Baur (2002). Dante As Philosopher at the Boundary of Reason. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:193-210.
Jason Aleksander (2011). Dante's Understanding of the Two Ends of Human Desire and the Relationship Between Philosophy and Theology. Journal of Religion 91 (2):158-187.
A. P. D.’Entrèves (1955). Dante. Monarchy and Three Political Letters. With an Introduction by Donald Nichoix, and a Note on the Chronology of Dante's Political Works by Colin Hardie. (“Library of Ideas,” Weidenfeld and Nicolson: London, 1954.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 30 (115):373-.
Peter Levine (2009). Reforming the Humanities: Literature and Ethics From Dante Through Modern Times. Palgrave Macmillan.
John Kleiner (1995). Book Review: Mismapping the Underworld: Daring and Error in Dante's 'Comedy'. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Literature 19 (2).
Dante (2006). The Divine Comedy. In Thomas L. Cooksey (ed.), Masterpieces of Philosophical Literature. Greenwood Press.
B. Horne (2003). Can We Inhabit the Moral Universe of Dante's Divine Comedy? Studies in Christian Ethics 16 (1):61-71.
Edward Donald Kennedy (1995). Book Review: Mismapping the Underworld: Daring and Error in Dante's 'Comedy'. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Literature 19 (2):415-416.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-01-31
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?