Horror Films and the Argument from Reactive Attitudes
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):309-324 (2013)
| Abstract | Are horror films immoral? Gianluca Di Muzio argues that horror films of a certain kind are immoral because they undermine the reactive attitudes that are responsible for human agents being disposed to respond compassionately to instances of victimization. I begin with this argument as one instance of what I call the Argument from Reactive Attitudes (ARA), and I argue that Di Muzio’s attempt to identify what is morally suspect about horror films must be revised to provide the most persuasive interpretation of the ARA. I then argue that the ARA provides a compelling standard for evaluating the moral permissibility of creating and viewing horror films, yet I note that it is an exceedingly difficult practical task evaluating the risk that these films create for our reactive attitudes. My conclusion is that the ARA provides a useful way or orienting ourselves to the complicated details of evaluating the moral status of horror films | |||||||||
| Keywords | Applied ethics Horror films Reactive attitudes | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesGianluca Di Muzio (2006). The Immorality of Horror Films. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (2):277-294.
S. Evan Kreider (2008). The Virtue of Horror Films. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):149-157.
Curtis Bowman (2003). Horror's Philosophic Auteurs: Heidegger, the Uncanny, and Jacques Tourneur's Horror Films. In Steven Jay Schneider & Daniel Shaw (eds.), Dark Thoughts: Philosophic Reflections on Cinematic Horror. Scarecrow Press.
Thomas Richard Fahy (ed.) (2010). The Philosophy of Horror. University Press of Kentucky.
Gianluca di Muzio (2006). The Immorality of Horror Films. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (2).
Steven Jay Schneider & Daniel Shaw (eds.) (2003). Dark Thoughts: Philosophic Reflections on Cinematic Horror. Scarecrow Press.
Aaron Smuts (2003). Haunting the House From Within: Disbelief, Mitigation, and Spatial Experience. In Steven Jay Schneider & Daniel Shaw (eds.), Dark Thoughts: Philosophic Reflections on Cinematic Horror. Scarecrow Press.
Elisa A. Hurley & Coleen Macnamara (2011). Beyond Belief: Toward a Theory of the Reactive Attitudes. Philosophical Papers 39 (3):373-399.
Aaron Smuts (2002). Sympathetic Spectators: Roman Polanski's Le Locataire (The Tenant, 1976). Kinoeye 2 (3).
Scott A. Lukas & John Marmysz (eds.) (2009). Fear, Cultural Anxiety, and Transformation: Horror, Science Fiction, and Fantasy Films Remade. Lexington Books.
Aaron Smuts (2008). Horror. In Paisley Livingston & Carl Plantinga (eds.), Routledge Companion to Philosophy and Film.
Angus Ross (2008). Rationality and the Reactive Attitudes. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 4 (1):45-58.
Deborah Perron Tollefsen (2003). Participant Reactive Attitudes and Collective Responsibility. Philosophical Explorations 6 (3):218 – 234.
John Dilworth (2003). Ariadne at the Movies. Contemporary Aesthetics 1 (1):Online.
Christopher Ciocchetti (2003). The Responsibility of the Psychopathic Offender. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 10 (2):175-183.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2012-02-06Total downloads15 ( #78,648 of 549,093 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,228 of 549,093 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
