Horror Films and the Argument from Reactive Attitudes

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):309-324 (2013)
Abstract
Are horror films immoral? Gianluca Di Muzio argues that horror films of a certain kind are immoral because they undermine the reactive attitudes that are responsible for human agents being disposed to respond compassionately to instances of victimization. I begin with this argument as one instance of what I call the Argument from Reactive Attitudes (ARA), and I argue that Di Muzio’s attempt to identify what is morally suspect about horror films must be revised to provide the most persuasive interpretation of the ARA. I then argue that the ARA provides a compelling standard for evaluating the moral permissibility of creating and viewing horror films, yet I note that it is an exceedingly difficult practical task evaluating the risk that these films create for our reactive attitudes. My conclusion is that the ARA provides a useful way or orienting ourselves to the complicated details of evaluating the moral status of horror films
Keywords Applied ethics  Horror films  Reactive attitudes
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,316
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Amy Coplan (2004). Empathic Engagement with Narrative Fictions. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62 (2):141–152.
Gianluca di Muzio (2006). The Immorality of Horror Films. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (2).
B. J. Diggs (1981). A Contractarian View of Respect for Persons. American Philosophical Quarterly 18 (4):273 - 283.

View all 30 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Gianluca Di Muzio (2006). The Immorality of Horror Films. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (2):277-294.
S. Evan Kreider (2008). The Virtue of Horror Films. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):149-157.
Gianluca di Muzio (2006). The Immorality of Horror Films. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (2).
Aaron Smuts (2008). Horror. In Paisley Livingston & Carl Plantinga (eds.), Routledge Companion to Philosophy and Film.
Angus Ross (2008). Rationality and the Reactive Attitudes. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 4 (1):45-58.
John Dilworth (2003). Ariadne at the Movies. Contemporary Aesthetics 1 (1).
Christopher Ciocchetti (2003). The Responsibility of the Psychopathic Offender. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 10 (2):175-183.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-02-06

Total downloads

27 ( #60,937 of 1,096,453 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #26,676 of 1,096,453 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.