David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
OUP USA (2011)
We live in a world where CEOs give themselves million pound bonuses even as their companies go bankrupt and ordinary workers are laid off; where athletes make millions while teachers struggle to survive; a world, in short, where rewards are often unfairly meted out. In The Ajax Dilemma, Paul Woodruff examines one of today's most pressing moral issues: how to distribute rewards and public recognition without damaging the social fabric. How should we honour those whose behaviour and achievement is essential to our overall success? Is it fair or right to lavish rewards on the superstar at the expense of the hardworking rank-and-file? How do we distinguish an impartial fairness from what is truly just? Woodruff builds his answer to these questions around the ancient conflict between Ajax and Odysseus over the armour of the slain warrior Achilles. King Agamemnon arranges a speech contest to decide the issue. Ajax, the loyal workhorse, loses the contest, and the priceless armour, to Odysseus, the brilliantly deceptive strategist who will lead the Greeks to victory. Deeply insulted, Ajax goes on a rampage and commits suicide, and in his rage we see the resentment of every loyal worker who has been passed over in favour of those who are more gifted, or whose skills are more highly valued. How should we deal with the 'Ajax dilemma'? Woodruff argues that while we can never create a perfect system for distributing just rewards, we can recognize the essential role that wisdom, compassion, moderation, and respect must play if we are to restore the basic sense of justice on which all communities depend. This short, thoughtful book, written with Woodruff's characteristic elegance, investigates some of the most bitterly divisive global issues today.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Buy the book||$5.21 used (74% off) $11.49 new (43% off) $13.77 direct from Amazon (31% off) Amazon page|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Massimo Pigliucci (2013). The Ajax Dilemma. [REVIEW] Philosophy Now (95).
D. W. Lucas (1955). A New Commentary on the Ajax J. C. Kamerbeek: The Plays of Sophocles—Commentaries. I: The Ajax. English Translation by H. Schreuder, Revised by A. Parker. Pp. Ix+261. Leiden: Brill, 1953. Cloth, Fl. 46. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 5 (02):145-147.
Graham Zanker (2005). Ajax J. Hesk: Sophocles: Ajax. (Duckworth Companions to Greek and Roman Tragedy.) Pp. 208. London: Duckworth, 2003. Paper, £10.99. ISBN: 0-7156-3047-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 55 (01):19-.
Michael Comber (1988). Sophocles' Ajax Joe Park Poe: Genre and Meaning in Sophocles' Ajax. (Beiträge Zur Klassischen Philologie, 172.) Pp. 102. Frankfurt Am Main: Athenäum, 1987. DM 34. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 38 (02):207-208.
J. H. Kells (1964). The Ajax of Sophocles W. B. Stanford:Sophocles, Ajax. Edited with Introduction, Revised Text, Commentary, Appendixes, Indexes, and Bibliography. Pp. Lxiv 311. London: Macmillan, 1963. Cloth, 20s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 14 (03):247-250.
Susan Prince (1999). Ajax, Odysseus, and the Act of Self-Representation. Ancient Philosophy 19 (Special):55-64.
John Alcorn (1994). Argument and Allocation: The Contention of Ajax and Ulysses for the Armor of Achilles. Science and Society 58 (2):163 - 174.
Harlan R. Beckley (1986). A Christian Affirmation of Rawls's Idea of Justice as Fairness -- Part II. Journal of Religious Ethics 14 (2):229 - 246.
Lucía Romero Mariscal (2011). Ajax and Achilles Playing a Board Game: Revisited From the Literary Tradition. The Classical Quarterly 61 (02):394-401.
S. A. (1897). Jebb's Ajax. The Classical Review 11 (02):113-116.
Richard L. Lippke (2008). To Waive or Not to Waive: The Right to Trial and Plea Bargaining. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):181-199.
P. T. Stevens (1986). Ajax in the Trugrede. The Classical Quarterly 36 (02):327-.
Harlan R. Beckley (1985). A Christian Affirmation of Rawls's Idea of Justice as Fairness: Part I. Journal of Religious Ethics 13 (2):210 - 242.
Richard Griffin & Daniel Dennett (2005). Comparing Apples to Oranges: Who Does the Framing? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):656-656.
Added to index2012-04-15
Total downloads3 ( #220,397 of 1,004,657 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,617 of 1,004,657 )
How can I increase my downloads?