Graduate studies at Western
Inquiry 25 (December):435-50 (1982)
|Abstract||The anti?Cartesian idea that a person's thoughts are not entirely fixed by what goes on inside that person's head is suggested by Hegel, and echoed in Wittgenstein and Frege. An argument for the view has recently been given by Tyler Burge. This paper claims that Burge's data can be explained better by an individualistic theory. The basic idea is that an individual's thoughts are specified analogically, in ordinary discourse, through the model of a language. Though the modelling?sentences are public, the thoughts of the individual are inner states whose identity does not depend upon those sentences. They have content naturally, whether or not content happens to be ascribed to them|
|Keywords||Epistemology Language Sentence Thought Burge, T|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Tyler Burge (2005). Truth, Thought, Reason: Essays on Frege. Oxford University Press.
Aaron Z. Zimmerman (2006). Self-Verification and the Content of Thought. Synthese 149 (1):59-75.
Joan Weiner (1995). Realismbei Frege: Reply to Burge. Synthese 102 (3):363 - 382.
Krista Lawlor (2002). Memory, Anaphora, and Content Preservation. Philosophical Studies 109 (2):97-119.
Christopher Gauker (1991). Mental Content and the Division of Epistemic Labour. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69 (September):302-18.
Christopher Gauker (2003). Social Externalism and Linguistic Communication. In Maria J. Frapolli & E. Romero (eds.), Meaning, Basic Self-Knowledge, and Mind: Essays on Tyler Burge. CSLI.
Michael V. Antony (1993). Social Relations and the Individuation of Thought. Mind 102 (406):247-61.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #189,863 of 754,609 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,000 of 754,609 )
How can I increase my downloads?