Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (1):103 – 113 (2005)
|Abstract||For scientific essentialists, the only logical possibilities of existence are the real (or metaphysical) ones, and such possibilities, they say, are relative to worlds. They are not a priori, and they cannot just be invented. Rather, they are discoverable only by the a posteriori methods of science. There are, however, many philosophers who think that real possibilities are knowable a priori, or that they can just be invented. Marc Lange [Lange 2004] thinks that they can be invented, and tries to use his inventions to argue that the essentialist theory of counterfactual conditionals developed in Scientific Essentialism [Ellis 2001, hereafter SE ] is flawed.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
JC Beall & Bradley Armour-Garb (2003). Should Deflationists Be Dialetheists? Noûs 37 (2):303–324.
Bradley Armour-Garb (2001). Deflationism and the Meaningless Strategy. Analysis 61 (4):280–289.
Jonathan E. Adler & Bradley Armour-Garb (2007). Moore's Paradox and the Transparency of Belief. In Mitchell S. Green & John N. Williams (eds.), Moore's Paradox: New Essays on Belief, Rationality, and the First Person. Oxford University Press.
Bradley Armour-Garb & James A. Woodbridge (2010). Truthmakers, Paradox and Plausibility. Analysis 70 (1):11-23.
J. C. Beall & B. Armour-Garb (eds.) (2006). Deflationism and Paradox. Oxford University Press.
B. Armour-Garb (2012). No Consistent Way with Paradox. Analysis 72 (1):66-75.
M. Balaguer (2011). Reply to Armour-Garb. Philosophia Mathematica 19 (3):345-348.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #106,370 of 549,127 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,127 )
How can I increase my downloads?