David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (1):151-161 (2009)
As the United States is currently prosecuting two wars, it is important to consider whether those wars, and the resulting noncombatantcasualties, can be morally justified. Such consideration can be initiated by considering some of Alan Donagan’s work in his book The Theory of Morality. In that book Donagan sets out to develop, as a philosophical system, that part of the common morality according to the Hebrew-Christian tradition, which does not depend on any theistic beliefs. According to that tradition it is sometimes morally permissible to resort to war. This poses a problem because also part of the tradition is a near absolute prohibition on harming innocent people. Since innocent people die in war, there is a tension here.Donagan claims that this problem can be solved by assigning the blame for some such deaths to the aggressor, thereby permitting (some) resorts to war. This paper shows that this solution is inadequate; and defends a more plausible (and more traditional) justification for some innocent deaths. This justification is consistent with the system Donagan develops, and thus may have application in the consideration of the justification of the two wars currently being prosecuted by the United States
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Vicente Medina (2013). The Innocent in the Just War Thinking of Vitoria and Suárez: A Challenge Even for Secular Just War Theorists and International Law. Ratio Juris 26 (1):47-64.
Jerald H. Richards (1980). Alan Donagan, Hebrew-Christian Morality, and Capital Punishment. Journal of Religious Ethics 8 (2):302 - 329.
Terrance C. McConnell (1981). Moral Absolutism and the Problem of Hard Cases. Journal of Religious Ethics 9 (2):286 - 297.
Daniel F. Montaldi (1986). A Defense of St. Thomas and the Principle of Double Effect. Journal of Religious Ethics 14 (2):296 - 332.
Jeff McMahan (2010). Pacifism and Moral Theory. Diametros 23:44-68.
Josef Stern (2012). Maimonides on Wars and Their Justification. Journal of Military Ethics 11 (3):245-263.
Whitley R. P. Kaufman (2004). Terrorism, Self-Defense, and the Killing of the Innocent. Social Philosophy Today 20:41-52.
John W. Lango (2010). Nonlethal Weapons, Noncombatant Immunity, and Combatant Nonimmunity: A Study of Just War Theory. [REVIEW] Philosophia 38 (3):475-497.
John A. Vasquez (1993). The War Puzzle. Cambridge University Press.
Steven P. Lee (2010). Humanitarian Intervention - Eight Theories. Diametros 23:22-43.
Uwe Steinhoff (2012). The Moral Equality of Modern Combatants and the Myth of Justified War. Theoretical and Applied Ethics 1 (4):35-44.
A. Ferguson (2006). No Just War for the Empire. Radical Philosophy Today 2006:27-37.
Karsten J. Struhl (2006). Can There Be a Just War? Radical Philosophy Today 2006:3-25.
Robert Sparrow (2005). “Hands Up Who Wants to Die?”: Primoratz on Responsibility and Civilian Immunity in Wartime. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (3):299 - 319.
Alan Donagan (1994). The Philosophical Papers of Alan Donagan. University of Chicago Press.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads3 ( #223,982 of 1,088,398 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,398 )
How can I increase my downloads?