Two Objections to System CC1 of Connexive Implication
Dialogue 7 (03):473-475 (1968)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesStorrs McCall (1967). Connexive Implication and the Syllogism. Mind 76 (303):346-356.
Storrs McCall (1966). Connexive Implication. Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (3):415-433.
Andreas Kapsner (2012). Strong Connexivity. Thought 1 (2):141-145.
Philip Kremer (1997). Defining Relevant Implication in a Propositionally Quantified S. Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (4):1057-1069.
Jonathan P. Seldin (2000). On the Role of Implication in Formal Logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (3):1076-1114.
Marcello D'agostino, Dov M. Gabbay & Alessandra Russo (1997). Grafting Modalities Onto Substructural Implication Systems. Studia Logica 59 (1):65-102.
Fabrice Correia (2001). Priorean Strict Implication, Q and Related Systems. Studia Logica 69 (3):411-427.
Shahid Rahman & Helge Rückert (2001). Dialogical Connexive Logic. Synthese 127 (1-2):105 - 139.
Jukka Mikkonen, Implicit Assertions in Literary Fiction. Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics, vol. 2.
Mitsuhiro Okada (1987). A Weak Intuitionistic Propositional Logic with Purely Constructive Implication. Studia Logica 46 (4):371 - 382.
Douglas Walton (2012). Building a System for Finding Objections to an Argument. Argumentation 26 (3):369-391.
Richard Routley (1978). Semantics for Connexive Logics. I. Studia Logica 37 (4):393 - 412.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2010-09-25Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
