Confirmation: two types, both logical not historical
| Abstract | Working paper (on author's web-page) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesBranden Fitelson (2006). Logical Foundations of Evidential Support. Philosophy of Science 73 (5):500-512.
Jared Darlington (1959). On the Confirmation of Laws. Philosophy of Science 26 (1):14-24.
Colin Johnston (2009). Tractarian Objects and Logical Categories. Synthese 167 (1):145 - 161.
Branden Fitelson (2006). The Paradox of Confirmation. Philosophy Compass 1 (1):95–113.
Aysel Dogan (2005). Confirmation of Scientific Hypotheses as Relations. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 36 (2):243 - 259.
John Corcoran (1969). Three Logical Theories. Philosophy of Science 36 (2):153-177.
Aron Edidin (1988). From Relative Confirmation to Real Confirmation. Philosophy of Science 55 (2):265-271.
Irving M. Copi (1971). The Theory of Logical Types. London,Routledge and K. Paul.
Alan Musgrave (1974). Logical Versus Historical Theories of Confirmation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):1-23.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-07-26Total downloads7 ( #133,343 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
