Graduate studies at Western
Synthese 129 (3):319-33 (2001)
|Abstract||Margaret Gilbert explores the phenomenon referred to in everyday ascriptions of beliefs to groups. She refers to this type of phenomenon as "collective belief" and calls the types of groups that are the bearers of such beliefs "plural subjects". I argue that the attitudes that groups adopt that Gilbert refers to as "collective beliefs" are not a species of belief in an important and central sense, but rather a species of acceptance. Unlike proper beliefs, a collective belief is adopted by a group as a means to realizing the group's goals. Unless we recognize that this phenomenon is a species of acceptance, plural subjects will seem prone to change their "beliefs" for irrelevant reasons, and thus frequently appear to act in an irrational manner|
|Keywords||Acceptance Belief Collective Group Metaphysics Gilbert, M|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Christopher McMahon (2006). Collective Wisdom and Individual Freedom. Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (S1):168-176.
Don Fallis (2007). Collective Epistemic Goals. Social Epistemology 21 (3):267 – 280.
Kay Mathiesen (2006). The Epistemic Features of Group Belief. Episteme 2 (3):161-175.
Raul Hakli (2007). On the Possibility of Group Knowledge Without Belief. Social Epistemology 21 (3):249 – 266.
Reza Lahroodi (2007). Collective Epistemic Virtues. Social Epistemology 21 (3):281 – 297.
Raimo Tuomela (2000). Belief Versus Acceptance. Philosophical Explorations 3 (2):122 – 137.
Melinda Bonnie Fagan (2011). Is There Collective Scientific Knowledge? Arguments From Explanation. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (243):247-269.
M. Gilbert (2002). Belief and Acceptance as Features of Groups. Protosociology 16:35-69.
Margaret Gilbert (1987). Modelling Collective Belief. Synthese 73 (1):185-204.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads97 ( #8,401 of 741,277 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #12,331 of 741,277 )
How can I increase my downloads?