Heidegger, truth, and reference
Inquiry 45 (2):217 – 228 (2002)
| Abstract | This Article does not have an abstract | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJames E. Faulconer & Mark A. Wrathall (eds.) (2000). Appropriating Heidegger. Cambridge University Press.
William H. Smith (2007). Why Tugendhat's Critique of Heidegger's Concept of Truth Remains a Critical Problem. Inquiry 50 (2):156 – 179.
Daniel O. Dahlstrom (2001). Heidegger's Concept of Truth. Cambridge University Press.
Mark A. Wrathall (1999). The Conditions of Truth in Heidegger and Davidson. The Monist 82 (2):304-323.
Rufus Duits (2007). On Tugendhat's Analysis of Heidegger's Concept of Truth. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (2):207 – 223.
Barbara Fultner (2005). Referentiality in Frege and Heidegger. Philosophy and Social Criticism 31 (1):37-52.
Michael D. Robinson (2009). Truth in Metaphysics. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (4):467-490.
Mark A. Wrathall (2010). Heidegger and Unconcealment: Truth, Language, and History. Cambridge University Press.
Mark A. Wrathall (1999). Heidegger and Truth as Correspondence. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7 (1):69 – 88.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads39 ( #30,446 of 556,803 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #39,010 of 556,803 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
