Graduate studies at Western
Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S467- (2001)
|Abstract||Philip Kitcher rejects the global pessimists' view that the conclusions reached in inquiry are determined by the interests of some segment of the population, arguing that only some inquiries, for example, inquiries into race and gender, are adversely affected by interests. I argue that the biases Kitcher believes affect such inquiries are operative in all domains, but the prevalence of such biases does not support global pessimism. I argue further that in order to address the global pessimists' concerns, the scientific community needs criticism from people with diverse interests and background assumptions.|
|Keywords||Kitcher, Philip bias skepticism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Amarbayasgalan Dorjderem (2011). Global Climate Change: Interests of Foreigners. ETHICS IN SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS 11:31-37.
Pablo Gilabert (2012). From Global Poverty to Global Equality: A Philosophical Exploration. Oxford University Press, UK.
Wang Xinyan (2006). Globalization and Common Human Interests. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 9:173-177.
Aaron Maltais (2008). Global Warming and Our Natural Duties of Justice. Dissertation, Uppsala University
C. Daryl Cameron, Joshua Knobe & B. Keith Payne (2010). Do Theories of Implicit Race Bias Change Moral Judgments? Social Justice Research 23:272-289.
Mark A. Seabright (2011). The Role of the Affect Heuristic in Moral Reactions to Climate Change. Journal of Global Ethics 6 (1):5-15.
Keith Horton (2004). Aid and Bias. Inquiry 47 (6):545 – 561.
Linda Mealey (2000). The Illusory Function of Dreams: Another Example of Cognitive Bias. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):971-972.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #107,456 of 739,352 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,352 )
How can I increase my downloads?