David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Contemporary Pragmatism 2 (1):95-113 (2005)
C. S. Peirce once defined pragmatism as the opinion that metaphysics is to be largely cleared up by the application of the following maxim for attaining clearness of apprehension: ‘Consider what effects that might conceivably have practical bearings we conceive the object of our conception to have. Then, our conception of these effects is the whole of our conception of the object.’ (Peirce 1982a: 48) More succinctly, Richard Rorty has described the position in this way.
|Keywords||pragmatism truth goal of inquiry Rorty|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kai Nielsen (1986). Scientism, Pragmatism, and the Fate of Philosophy. Inquiry 29 (1-4):277 – 304.
Aaron Cooley (2007). Review: Of Westbrook, Democratic Hope: Pragmatism and the Politics of Truth. [REVIEW] Education and Culture 23 (2):pp. 76-79.
Robert Brandom (2011). Perspectives on Pragmatism: Classical, Recent, and Contemporary. Harvard University Press.
C. J. Misak (2004). Truth and the End of Inquiry: A Peircean Account of Truth. Oxford University Press.
John C. Malone (2004). Pragmatism and Radical Behaviorism: A Response to Leigland. Behavior and Philosophy 32 (2):313 - 315.
Steven Levine (2010). Rehabilitating Objectivity: Rorty, Brandom, and the New Pragmatism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40 (4):567-589.
John O. Nelson (1995). Pragmatism According to Rorty. Journal of Philosophical Research 20:349-366.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads60 ( #20,665 of 1,016,095 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #39,366 of 1,016,095 )
How can I increase my downloads?