Alberti's de pictura: Its literary structure and purpose
Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 47:52-71 (1984)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJerome Kemp (2010). A Moral Purpose, A Literary Game. Classical World 104 (1).
John R. Spencer (1957). Ut Rhetorica Pictura: A Study in Quattrocento Theory of Painting. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 20 (1/2):26-44.
Pierre Bourdieu (1996). The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Polity Press.
Roy Park (1969). "Ut Pictura Poesis": The Nineteenth-Century Aftermath. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 28 (2):155-164.
Wesley Trimpi (1973). The Meaning of Horace's Ut Pictura Poesis. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 36:1-34.
Rémy G. Saisselin (1961). Ut Pictura Poesis: Dubos to Diderot. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 20 (2):144-156.
George P. Landow (1968). Ruskin's Version of "Ut Pictura Poesis". Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 26 (4):521-528.
J. Thomas Rimer (2004). Literary Stances : The Structure of Iki. In Hiroshi Nara (ed.), The Structure of Detachment: The Aesthetic Vision of Kuki Shuzo. University of Hawaii Press.
Roger Paden (2001). Values and Planning: The Argument From Renaissance Utopianism. Ethics, Place and Environment 4 (1):5 – 30.
Ann Hurley (1989). Ut Pictura Poesis: Vermeer's Challenge to Some Renaissance Literary Assumptions. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 47 (4):348-357.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #113,941 of 549,005 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 549,005 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
