Cogency and question-begging: Some reflections on McKinsey's paradox and Putnam's proof

Philosophical Issues 10 (1):140-63 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2010

DOI

10.1111/0029-4624.34.s1.17

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Frankfurt-style counterexamples and begging the question.Stewart Goetz - 2005 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 29 (1):83-105.
Question-begging under a non-foundational model of argument.Peter Suber - 1994 - Argumentation 8 (3):241-250.
Petitio principii: What's wrong?Andrea Iacona & Diego Marconi - 2005 - Facta Philosophica 7 (1):19-34.
Running in Circles about Begging the Question.D. A. Truncellito - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (3):325-329.
Skepticism, Question Begging, and Burden Shifting.Paul K. Moser - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 5:209-217.
Begging the question as a pragmatic fallacy.Douglas N. Walton - 1994 - Synthese 100 (1):95 - 131.
Begging the Question.David H. Sanford - 1972 - Analysis 32 (6):197-199.
McKinsey paradoxes, radical skepticism, and the transmission of knowledge across known entailments.Duncan Pritchard - 2002 - Synthese 130 (2):279-302.
Begging the question.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1999 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 (2):174 – 191.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
890 (#15,319)

6 months
21 (#115,623)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What's wrong with Moore's argument?James Pryor - 2004 - Philosophical Issues 14 (1):349–378.
Highlights of recent epistemology.James Pryor - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (1):95--124.
(Anti-)sceptics simple and subtle: G. E. Moore and John McDowell.Crispin Wright - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (2):330-348.

View all 61 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references