Cogency and question-begging: Some reflections on McKinsey's paradox and Putnam's proof

Philosophical Issues 10 (s1):140-63 (2000)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Cogency  Question Begging  Mckinsey, M  Putnam, H
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/0029-4624.34.s1.17
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
James Pryor (2004). What's Wrong with Moore's Argument? Philosophical Issues 14 (1):349–378.
James Pryor (2004). What's Wrong with Moore's Argument? Philosophical Issues 14 (1):349-378.
Martin Smith (2009). Transmission Failure Explained. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (1):164-189.
Nicholas Silins (2005). Transmission Failure Failure. Philosophical Studies 126 (1):71 - 102.

View all 31 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

404 ( #1,690 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

346 ( #468 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.