Comment on Paul Boghossian, “What is inference”

Philosophical Studies:1-11 (2012)
Abstract
This is a response to Paul Boghossian’s paper: What is inference? (doi:10.1007/s11098-012-9903-x). The paper and the abstract originate from a symposium at the Pacific Division Meeting of the APA in San Diego in April 2011. John Broome was a co-commentator
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,351
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Randolph Clarke (2012). Absence of Action. Philosophical Studies 158 (2):361-376.
    Brian Hedden (2012). Options and the Subjective Ought. Philosophical Studies 158 (2):343-360.
    John Fischer (2012). Replies to Critics. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 158 (3):529-540.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2012-03-23

    Total downloads

    120 ( #6,240 of 1,088,384 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    12 ( #9,292 of 1,088,384 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.