Comment on Paul Boghossian, “What is inference”

Philosophical Studies (1):1-11 (2012)
This is a response to Paul <span class='Hi'>Boghossian</span>’s paper: What is inference? (doi:10.1007/s11098-012-9903-x). The paper and the abstract originate from a symposium at the Pacific Division Meeting of the APA in San Diego in April 2011. John Broome was a co-commentator.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-012-9892-9
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
John Broome (2012). Comments on Boghossian. Philosophical Studies 169 (1):19-25.
Randolph Clarke (2012). Absence of Action. Philosophical Studies 158 (2):361-376.
Brian Hedden (2012). Options and the Subjective Ought. Philosophical Studies 158 (2):343-360.
John Fischer (2012). Replies to Critics. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 158 (3):529-540.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

202 ( #8,785 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

21 ( #40,147 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.