Comment on Paul Boghossian, “What is inference”

Philosophical Studies (1):1-11 (2012)
Abstract
This is a response to Paul Boghossian’s paper: What is inference? (doi:10.1007/s11098-012-9903-x). The paper and the abstract originate from a symposium at the Pacific Division Meeting of the APA in San Diego in April 2011. John Broome was a co-commentator
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,269
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
John Broome (2012). Comments on Boghossian. Philosophical Studies (1):1-7.
Randolph Clarke (2012). Absence of Action. Philosophical Studies 158 (2):361-376.
Brian Hedden (2012). Options and the Subjective Ought. Philosophical Studies 158 (2):343-360.
John Fischer (2012). Replies to Critics. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 158 (3):529-540.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-03-23

Total downloads

132 ( #5,998 of 1,096,180 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

18 ( #6,748 of 1,096,180 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.