Philosophy of Science 39 (2):204-218 (1972)
|Abstract||This paper develops and draws the consequences of an etiological analysis of goal-directedness modeled on one that functions centrally in Charles Taylor's work on action. The author first presents, criticizes, and modifies Taylor's formulation, and then shows his modified formulation accounts easily for much of the fine-structure of teleological concepts and conceptualizations. Throughout, the author is at pains to show that teleological explanations are orthodox from an empiricist's point of view: they require nothing novel methodologically|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Daniel Kolb (1992). Kant, Teleology, and Evolution. Synthese 91 (1-2):9 - 28.
Scott R. Sehon (1997). Deviant Causal Chains and the Irreducibility of Teleological Explanation. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (2):195–213.
Mariska Elisabeth Maria Philomena Johannes Leunissen, Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle's Philosophy of Nature.
L. Wright (1976). Teleological Explanations: An Etiological Analysis of Goals and Functions. University of California Press.
Marko Uršič (2002). Cogito Ergo Mundus Talis Est. Acta Analytica 17 (1):53-67.
James Kreines (2005). The Inexplicability of Kant's Naturzweck: Kant on Teleology, Explanation and Biology. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 87 (3):270-311.
Mariska Leunissen (2010). Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle's Science of Nature. Cambridge University Press.
James G. Lennox (1993). Darwin Was a Teleologist. Biology and Philosophy 8 (4):409-421.
David B. Hausman (1985). The Explanation of Goal-Directed Behavior. Synthese 65 (3):327 - 346.
Elizabeth Valentine (1988). Teleological Explanations and Their Relation to Causal Explanation in Psychology. Philosophical Psychology 1 (1):61-68.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #37,960 of 549,129 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,129 )
How can I increase my downloads?